PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSPX.AS vs. FDRV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSPX.AS vs. FDRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) and Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSPX.AS is traded in EUR, while FDRV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FDRV values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSPX.AS achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly lower than FDRV's 30.77% return.


CSPX.AS

1D
-0.10%
1M
5.25%
YTD
11.52%
6M
11.45%
1Y
25.69%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
14.96%

FDRV

1D
-1.37%
1M
9.65%
YTD
30.77%
6M
26.42%
1Y
46.99%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSPX.AS vs. FDRV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CSPX.AS
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
11.52%4.00%33.87%22.28%-14.24%10.51%
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
30.77%9.57%-16.57%8.90%-40.77%8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CSPX.AS and FDRV is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021

0.42

The correlation between CSPX.AS and FDRV shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSPX.AS vs. FDRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSPX.AS
CSPX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FDRV
FDRV Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FDRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDRV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FDRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDRV Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSPX.AS vs. FDRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) and Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSPX.ASFDRVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

3.31

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.76

9.95

+2.81

CSPX.AS vs. FDRV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the FDRV Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSPX.AS and FDRV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSPX.ASFDRVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.95

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

-0.12

+1.05

Drawdowns

CSPX.AS vs. FDRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSPX.AS drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum FDRV drawdown of -62.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPX.AS and FDRV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSPX.ASFDRVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.65%

-62.50%

+28.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.11%

-14.27%

+7.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-48.25%

+24.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-29.93%

+29.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-40.18%

+35.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

4.74%

-2.74%

Volatility

CSPX.AS vs. FDRV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) is 2.59%, while Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) has a volatility of 8.61%. This indicates that CSPX.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSPX.ASFDRVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

8.61%

-6.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

17.65%

-10.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.26%

24.23%

-12.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

30.34%

-15.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

30.34%

-14.29%

CSPX.AS vs. FDRV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSPX.AS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FDRV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSPX.AS vs. FDRV - Dividend Comparison

CSPX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CSPX.AS
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
1.04%1.14%0.43%0.24%0.33%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSPX.AS and FDRV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSPX.AS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSPX.AS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDRV.

CSPX.AS is categorized as S&P 500, while FDRV is Transportation Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSPX.AS and 0.39% for FDRV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSPX.AS and FDRV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer