CSNDX.MI vs. IUSA.MI
CSNDX.MI (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IUSA.MI (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - CSNDX.MI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while IUSA.MI is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSNDX.MI returned 21.25%/yr vs 14.76%/yr for IUSA.MI. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSNDX.MI charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IUSA.MI.
Performance
CSNDX.MI vs. IUSA.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSNDX.MI achieves a 20.42% return, which is significantly higher than IUSA.MI's 11.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CSNDX.MI has outperformed IUSA.MI with an annualized return of 21.25%, while IUSA.MI has yielded a comparatively lower 14.76% annualized return.
CSNDX.MI
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 20.42%
- 6M
- 19.45%
- 1Y
- 37.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.66%
- 10Y*
- 21.25%
IUSA.MI
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 6M
- 11.37%
- 1Y
- 25.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.75%
- 5Y*
- 14.63%
- 10Y*
- 14.76%
CSNDX.MI vs. IUSA.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 20.42% | 6.74% | 35.09% | 50.07% | -30.24% | 39.83% | 35.45% | 41.91% | 3.62% | 16.34% |
IUSA.MI iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist | 11.29% | 4.17% | 33.56% | 22.16% | -14.75% | 40.69% | 7.30% | 34.11% | -1.42% | 6.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSNDX.MI and IUSA.MI is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2010 | 0.85 |
The correlation between CSNDX.MI and IUSA.MI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSNDX.MI vs. IUSA.MI — Risk / Return Rank
CSNDX.MI
IUSA.MI
CSNDX.MI vs. IUSA.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist (IUSA.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSNDX.MI | IUSA.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.42 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 3.54 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.18 | 12.66 | -1.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSNDX.MI | IUSA.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.27 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.96 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.08 | 0.91 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.60 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
CSNDX.MI vs. IUSA.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSNDX.MI drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, smaller than the maximum IUSA.MI drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSNDX.MI and IUSA.MI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSNDX.MI | IUSA.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.19% | -52.36% | +21.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -7.19% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.71% | -23.29% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.19% | -23.29% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.19% | -33.68% | +2.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.46% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -8.05% | +2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 2.01% | +1.36% |
Volatility
CSNDX.MI vs. IUSA.MI - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist (IUSA.MI) at 2.70%. This indicates that CSNDX.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSA.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSNDX.MI | IUSA.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 2.70% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.79% | 7.46% | +3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 11.24% | +4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 15.13% | +4.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 16.08% | +3.53% |
CSNDX.MI vs. IUSA.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSNDX.MI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSA.MI's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSNDX.MI vs. IUSA.MI - Dividend Comparison
CSNDX.MI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUSA.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IUSA.MI iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist | 0.73% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 0.84% | 1.21% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.33% | 1.25% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, CSNDX.MI and IUSA.MI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IUSA.MI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUSA.MI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CSNDX.MI.
CSNDX.MI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IUSA.MI is S&P 500. CSNDX.MI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while IUSA.MI tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CSNDX.MI and 0.07% for IUSA.MI.
Find the right allocation for CSNDX.MI and IUSA.MI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer