PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSMD vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CSMD vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CSMD vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CSMD
Congress SMID Growth ETF
-2.88%5.68%12.70%6.44%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.92%8.87%14.17%10.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSMD achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 1.92% return.


CSMD

1D
3.47%
1M
-8.78%
YTD
-2.88%
6M
-7.81%
1Y
11.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VB

1D
3.18%
1M
-5.13%
YTD
1.92%
6M
3.76%
1Y
19.75%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CSMD vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSMD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CSMD vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSMD
CSMD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSMD vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSMDVBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.49

0.91

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.86

1.41

-0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.19

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

1.39

-0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.47

5.97

-3.50

CSMD vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the VB Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSMD and VB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSMDVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

0.91

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.42

+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between CSMD and VB is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CSMD vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

CSMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSMD
Congress SMID Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.40%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.34%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Drawdowns

CSMD vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSMD drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMD and VB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CSMDVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.54%

-59.56%

+37.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.79%

-14.29%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.83%

-6.08%

-5.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-8.49%

+3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

3.32%

+1.14%

Volatility

CSMD vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 6.84%. This indicates that CSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CSMDVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.98%

6.84%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.86%

12.60%

+2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.59%

21.86%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.70%

20.78%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.70%

21.40%

-1.70%