CSMD vs. QQJG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CSMD (Congress SMID Growth ETF) and QQJG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. CSMD is actively managed, while QQJG is passively managed. Over the past year, CSMD returned 14.97% vs 18.92% for QQJG. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSMD charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQJG.

Performance

CSMD vs. QQJG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSMD achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly higher than QQJG's 1.44% return.

CSMD

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 7.59%
• YTD: 10.72%
• 6M: 8.83%
• 1Y: 14.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQJG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 18.92%
• 3Y*: 14.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSMD vs. QQJG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CSMD Congress SMID Growth ETF	10.72%	5.68%	12.70%	6.44%
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	1.44%	18.05%	14.67%	7.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CSMD and QQJG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023	0.79

The correlation between CSMD and QQJG shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CSMD vs. QQJG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CSMD	QQJG
Industrials	31.1%	6.4%
Technology	25.3%	44.5%
Healthcare	14.6%	18.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	14.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	3.4%
Financial Services	3.7%	0.1%
Energy	3.6%	1.6%
Basic Materials	2.0%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.6%	-
Communication Services	-	6.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CSMD vs. QQJG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSMD

CSMD Risk / Return Rank: 24
CSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
CSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 24

QQJG

QQJG Risk / Return Rank: 45
QQJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
QQJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
QQJG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
QQJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
QQJG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSMD vs. QQJG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSMD	QQJG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	1.37	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	1.97	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.29	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	2.42	-1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.09	8.87	-5.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSMD vs. QQJG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the QQJG Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSMD and QQJG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSMD	QQJG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	1.37	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.17	+0.50

Drawdowns

CSMD vs. QQJG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSMD drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum QQJG drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMD and QQJG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSMD	QQJG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.54%	-36.76%	+14.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.79%	-7.93%	-6.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.09%	+2.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-15.32%	+10.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.85%	2.15%	+2.70%

Volatility

CSMD vs. QQJG - Volatility Comparison

Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) at 0.00%. This indicates that CSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQJG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSMD	QQJG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.03%	0.00%	+6.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.45%	8.32%	+6.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.97%	14.05%	+4.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.77%	21.70%	-1.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.77%	21.70%	-1.93%

CSMD vs. QQJG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSMD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QQJG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSMD vs. QQJG - Dividend Comparison

CSMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.86%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CSMD Congress SMID Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.40%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	13.86%	0.68%	0.65%	0.54%	0.70%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSMD and QQJG in my portfolio?

CSMD and QQJG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSMD or QQJG?

CSMD has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to QQJG (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSMD dropped -22.54% vs QQJG's -36.76%.

Which ETF is better, CSMD or QQJG?

On 1-year performance, QQJG leads with 18.92% vs 14.97% for CSMD. On fees, QQJG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QQJG has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSMD or QQJG?

Over the 1-year period, QQJG has performed better with a 18.92% return vs 14.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSMD or QQJG?

QQJG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CSMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSMD or QQJG?

QQJG has the higher dividend yield at 13.86%, compared with 0.00% for CSMD.

What is the main difference between CSMD and QQJG?

They also come from different issuers: Congress and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CSMD and 0.20% for QQJG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQJG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.