PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSMD vs. IPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CSMD vs. IPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) and Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CSMD vs. IPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CSMD
Congress SMID Growth ETF
-2.88%5.68%12.70%6.44%
IPO
Renaissance IPO ETF
-8.19%5.45%15.68%20.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSMD achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly higher than IPO's -8.19% return.


CSMD

1D
3.47%
1M
-8.78%
YTD
-2.88%
6M
-7.81%
1Y
11.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IPO

1D
5.57%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
-8.19%
6M
-15.44%
1Y
12.12%
3Y*
13.00%
5Y*
-7.82%
10Y*
8.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CSMD vs. IPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSMD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IPO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CSMD vs. IPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSMD
CSMD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

IPO
IPO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSMD vs. IPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) and Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSMDIPODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.49

0.37

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.86

0.76

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.09

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

0.45

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.47

1.07

+1.40

CSMD vs. IPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the IPO Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSMD and IPO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSMDIPODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

0.37

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.22

+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between CSMD and IPO is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CSMD vs. IPO - Dividend Comparison

CSMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSMD
Congress SMID Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.40%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IPO
Renaissance IPO ETF
0.62%0.66%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.26%0.49%0.43%0.40%0.11%

Drawdowns

CSMD vs. IPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSMD drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum IPO drawdown of -68.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMD and IPO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CSMDIPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.54%

-68.76%

+46.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.79%

-26.24%

+11.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.83%

-44.53%

+32.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-22.77%

+18.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

11.01%

-6.55%

Volatility

CSMD vs. IPO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) is 7.98%, while Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) has a volatility of 10.75%. This indicates that CSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CSMDIPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.98%

10.75%

-2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.86%

22.44%

-7.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.59%

32.74%

-10.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.70%

35.81%

-16.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.70%

31.27%

-11.57%