PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSMCX vs. CMLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSMCX vs. CMLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) and Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSMCX achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly higher than CMLIX's 4.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSMCX having a 16.31% annualized return and CMLIX not far behind at 16.09%.


CSMCX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-4.47%
6M
6.88%
YTD
14.33%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
16.31%
ALL TIME*
12.26%

CMLIX

1D
1.50%
1M
-0.12%
6M
4.32%
YTD
4.59%
1Y
10.87%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
16.09%
ALL TIME*
10.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CSMCX vs. CMLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSMCX
Congress Small Cap Growth Fund
14.33%8.37%18.65%20.27%-26.21%39.30%39.11%36.12%2.51%22.58%
CMLIX
Congress Large Cap Growth Fund
4.59%12.70%27.69%32.36%-24.47%25.63%31.54%45.96%0.19%27.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CSMCX and CMLIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2010

0.80

The correlation between CSMCX and CMLIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSMCX vs. CMLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSMCX
CSMCX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CSMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CSMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

CMLIX
CMLIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CMLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CMLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSMCX vs. CMLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) and Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSMCXCMLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.11

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

0.69

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.06

2.45

+1.61

CSMCX vs. CMLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the CMLIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSMCX and CMLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSMCX vs. CMLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSMCX drawdown since its inception was -56.20%, which is greater than CMLIX's maximum drawdown of -30.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMCX and CMLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSMCXCMLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.20%

-30.32%

-25.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-13.29%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.10%

-20.51%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.44%

-30.32%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.44%

-30.32%

-3.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.44%

-2.37%

-3.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-7.26%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

3.74%

+0.65%

Volatility

CSMCX vs. CMLIX - Volatility Comparison

Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX) at 4.70%. This indicates that CSMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSMCXCMLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

4.70%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.34%

12.04%

+4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.99%

14.94%

+7.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.72%

19.21%

+3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.44%

20.25%

+2.19%

CSMCX vs. CMLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSMCX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CMLIX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSMCX vs. CMLIX - Dividend Comparison

CSMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than CMLIX's 6.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMLIX
Congress Large Cap Growth Fund
6.96%7.28%11.88%3.55%4.70%10.27%8.46%14.97%6.31%1.89%1.22%3.17%
CSMCX
Congress Small Cap Growth Fund
2.05%2.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%15.57%7.05%16.14%10.04%11.48%0.00%27.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSMCX and CMLIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSMCX has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to CMLIX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSMCX dropped -56.20% vs CMLIX's -30.32%.

CSMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSMCX and CMLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer