PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CMLIX vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CMLIX and QQQ is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

CMLIX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.04%
13.96%
CMLIX
QQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CMLIX:

0.78

QQQ:

1.37

Sortino Ratio

CMLIX:

1.10

QQQ:

1.86

Omega Ratio

CMLIX:

1.16

QQQ:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

CMLIX:

1.01

QQQ:

1.84

Martin Ratio

CMLIX:

3.09

QQQ:

6.35

Ulcer Index

CMLIX:

4.07%

QQQ:

3.92%

Daily Std Dev

CMLIX:

16.08%

QQQ:

18.24%

Max Drawdown

CMLIX:

-36.44%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

CMLIX:

-6.22%

QQQ:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMLIX achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 5.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CMLIX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 8.50%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.38% annualized return.


CMLIX

YTD

4.42%

1M

2.13%

6M

1.99%

1Y

14.10%

5Y*

7.53%

10Y*

8.50%

QQQ

YTD

5.53%

1M

3.41%

6M

12.16%

1Y

27.01%

5Y*

19.41%

10Y*

18.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMLIX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMLIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.


CMLIX
Congress Large Cap Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for CMLIX: current value at 0.68% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.68%
Expense ratio chart for QQQ: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMLIX vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMLIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMLIX is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMLIX is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMLIX is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMLIX is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMLIX is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMLIX is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CMLIX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CMLIX, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.781.37
The chart of Sortino ratio for CMLIX, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.101.86
The chart of Omega ratio for CMLIX, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.161.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for CMLIX, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.011.84
The chart of Martin ratio for CMLIX, currently valued at 3.09, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.003.096.35
CMLIX
QQQ

The current CMLIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMLIX and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.78
1.37
CMLIX
QQQ

Dividends

CMLIX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CMLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than QQQ's 0.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CMLIX
Congress Large Cap Growth Fund
0.08%0.08%0.44%0.62%0.13%0.24%0.51%0.60%0.52%0.83%0.66%0.42%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.53%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

CMLIX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMLIX drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMLIX and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.22%
0
CMLIX
QQQ

Volatility

CMLIX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX) is 3.92%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that CMLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.92%
4.69%
CMLIX
QQQ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab