CMLIX vs. QQQ

In the year-to-date period, CMLIX achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, CMLIX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 13.24%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.69% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CMLIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CMLIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMLIX and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CMLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, more than QQQ's 0.58% yield.

The maximum CMLIX drawdown since its inception was -30.32%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMLIX and QQQ.

The current volatility for Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX) is 4.81%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that CMLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.