CMLIX vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ).
CMLIX is managed by Congress. It was launched on Mar 15, 1928. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999.
Performance
CMLIX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMLIX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMLIX Congress Large Cap Growth Fund | -10.69% | 12.70% | 27.69% | 32.36% | -24.47% | 25.63% | 31.54% | 45.96% | 0.19% | 27.01% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | -5.93% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMLIX achieves a -10.69% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's -5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, CMLIX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 14.53%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.85% annualized return.
CMLIX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -8.80%
- YTD
- -10.69%
- 6M
- -10.71%
- 1Y
- 8.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.88%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.53%
QQQ
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -3.62%
- 1Y
- 23.68%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.88%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMLIX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMLIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMLIX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
CMLIX
QQQ
CMLIX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMLIX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.44 | 1.05 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.77 | 1.63 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.23 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 1.88 | -1.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | 6.95 | -5.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMLIX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 1.05 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.58 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.85 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.37 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMLIX and QQQ is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CMLIX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
CMLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMLIX Congress Large Cap Growth Fund | 8.15% | 7.28% | 11.88% | 3.55% | 4.70% | 10.27% | 8.46% | 14.97% | 6.31% | 1.89% | 1.22% | 3.17% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Drawdowns
CMLIX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMLIX drawdown since its inception was -30.32%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMLIX and QQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMLIX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.32% | -82.97% | +52.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -12.62% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.32% | -35.12% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.32% | -35.12% | +4.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.29% | -8.98% | -4.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -32.99% | +25.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 3.41% | +0.20% |
Volatility
CMLIX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX) is 5.10%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that CMLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMLIX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 6.51% | -1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 12.77% | -2.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 22.67% | -3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 22.39% | -3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 22.25% | -1.64% |