CSM vs. TQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ).
CSM and TQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Credit Suisse 130/30 Large-Cap Index. It was launched on Jul 13, 2009. TQQQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010. Both CSM and TQQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CSM vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSM vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus | -5.83% | 21.84% | 22.09% | 23.50% | -18.27% | 33.13% | 10.94% | 29.26% | -7.88% | 22.52% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | -20.81% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSM achieves a -5.83% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's -20.81% return. Over the past 10 years, CSM has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 12.84%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 34.82% annualized return.
CSM
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- -5.83%
- 6M
- -1.69%
- 1Y
- 18.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
TQQQ
- 1D
- 10.00%
- 1M
- -15.69%
- YTD
- -20.81%
- 6M
- -19.12%
- 1Y
- 46.49%
- 3Y*
- 45.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.72%
- 10Y*
- 34.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSM vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSM vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
CSM
TQQQ
CSM vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSM | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 0.69 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.37 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.25 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 3.87 | +2.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSM | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 0.69 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.19 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.53 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.64 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSM and TQQQ is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSM vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
CSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than TQQQ's 0.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus | 1.16% | 1.04% | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 0.78% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.54% | 1.28% | 1.49% | 1.67% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.76% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
CSM vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSM drawdown since its inception was -36.11%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSM and TQQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSM | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.11% | -81.66% | +45.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.92% | -36.97% | +24.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.82% | -81.66% | +57.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.11% | -81.66% | +45.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.17% | -30.66% | +23.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -18.66% | +14.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 12.00% | -9.18% |
Volatility
CSM vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) is 4.79%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 19.43%. This indicates that CSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSM | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 19.43% | -14.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.49% | 38.32% | -28.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.97% | 67.26% | -48.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 66.55% | -49.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 65.83% | -47.46% |