CSM vs. GSPY
CSM (Proshares Large Cap Core Plus) and GSPY (Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSM is a Long-Short fund tracking the Credit Suisse 130/30 Large-Cap Index, while GSPY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Gotham. CSM is passively managed, while GSPY is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSM returned 13.79%/yr vs 14.05%/yr for GSPY. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CSM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GSPY.
Performance
CSM vs. GSPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSM achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than GSPY's 11.85% return.
CSM
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 11.44%
- 1Y
- 30.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
GSPY
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 31.08%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 14.05%
- 10Y*
- —
CSM vs. GSPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus | 9.53% | 21.84% | 22.09% | 23.50% | -18.27% | 33.13% | 0.85% |
GSPY Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF | 11.85% | 18.28% | 23.58% | 26.01% | -17.07% | 27.53% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSM and GSPY is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between CSM and GSPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
CSM vs. GSPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSM
GSPY
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
CSM
GSPY
Financial Services
CSM
GSPY
Industrials
CSM
GSPY
Consumer Cyclical
CSM
GSPY
Healthcare
CSM
GSPY
Communication Services
CSM
GSPY
Consumer Defensive
CSM
GSPY
Utilities
CSM
GSPY
Real Estate
CSM
GSPY
Energy
CSM
GSPY
Basic Materials
CSM
GSPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSM vs. GSPY — Risk / Return Rank
CSM
GSPY
CSM vs. GSPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF (GSPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSM | GSPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | 2.52 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.52 | 3.31 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.46 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 3.65 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.22 | 16.53 | -2.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSM | GSPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.52 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.85 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.96 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
CSM vs. GSPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSM drawdown since its inception was -36.11%, which is greater than GSPY's maximum drawdown of -23.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSM and GSPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSM | GSPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.11% | -23.30% | -12.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.40% | -8.62% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.30% | -18.67% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.82% | -23.30% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.07% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -4.76% | +0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 1.91% | +0.24% |
Volatility
CSM vs. GSPY - Volatility Comparison
Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF (GSPY) have volatilities of 2.74% and 2.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSM | GSPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 2.75% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.78% | 8.86% | -0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.91% | 12.37% | -0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 16.55% | +0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 16.33% | +2.05% |
CSM vs. GSPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GSPY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSM vs. GSPY - Dividend Comparison
CSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than GSPY's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus | 1.00% | 1.04% | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 0.78% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.54% | 1.28% | 1.49% | 1.67% |
GSPY Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF | 2.34% | 2.61% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 1.25% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, CSM and GSPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GSPY has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to CSM (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSM dropped -36.11% vs GSPY's -23.30%.
On 5-year performance, GSPY leads with 14.05% vs 13.79% for CSM. On fees, CSM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSPY has performed better with a 14.05% return vs 13.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GSPY.
GSPY has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.00% for CSM.
CSM is categorized as Long-Short, while GSPY is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Gotham. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CSM and 0.50% for GSPY.
CSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSM and GSPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer