CSL vs. CVCG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and CVC Income & Growth Limited (CVCG.L).
Performance
CSL vs. CVCG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSL vs. CVCG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 5.02% | -12.26% | 19.14% | 34.26% | -4.08% | 60.64% | -1.96% | 63.10% | -10.31% | 4.51% |
CVCG.L CVC Income & Growth Limited | -3.50% | 15.54% | 29.10% | 24.09% | -17.45% | 15.81% | 3.86% | 0.37% | -5.16% | 25.70% |
Different Trading Currencies
CSL is traded in USD, while CVCG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CVCG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
CSL:
$14.00B
CVCG.L:
£271.98M
CSL:
$17.27
CVCG.L:
£0.06
CSL:
19.40
CVCG.L:
20.30
CSL:
0.51
CVCG.L:
0.32
CSL:
2.86
CVCG.L:
4.14
CSL:
7.80
CVCG.L:
0.82
CSL:
$5.02B
CVCG.L:
£62.39M
CSL:
$1.41B
CVCG.L:
£43.35M
CSL:
$1.16B
CVCG.L:
£43.05M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSL achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly higher than CVCG.L's -3.50% return. Over the past 10 years, CSL has outperformed CVCG.L with an annualized return of 14.28%, while CVCG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.40% annualized return.
CSL
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -14.91%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 6M
- 1.68%
- 1Y
- -1.24%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 16.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.28%
CVCG.L
- 1D
- 4.35%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- YTD
- -3.50%
- 6M
- -3.75%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSL vs. CVCG.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSL
CVCG.L
CSL vs. CVCG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and CVC Income & Growth Limited (CVCG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSL | CVCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | 0.23 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.21 | 0.45 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.06 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 0.38 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | 1.60 | -1.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSL | CVCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 0.23 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.44 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.28 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.24 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSL and CVCG.L is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CSL vs. CVCG.L - Dividend Comparison
CSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than CVCG.L's 8.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 1.28% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 1.02% | 1.09% | 0.86% | 1.31% | 1.11% | 1.53% | 1.27% | 1.18% | 1.24% |
CVCG.L CVC Income & Growth Limited | 8.59% | 8.64% | 8.58% | 8.08% | 5.68% | 4.49% | 5.14% | 5.54% | 5.07% | 4.64% | 6.04% | 4.90% |
Drawdowns
CSL vs. CVCG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSL drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, which is greater than CVCG.L's maximum drawdown of -52.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSL and CVCG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSL | CVCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.56% | -44.77% | -19.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.67% | -10.61% | -21.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.72% | -17.08% | -20.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.68% | -44.77% | +6.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.18% | -4.02% | -25.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.25% | -4.08% | -8.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.03% | 1.93% | +15.10% |
Volatility
CSL vs. CVCG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) is 9.63%, while CVC Income & Growth Limited (CVCG.L) has a volatility of 11.19%. This indicates that CSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVCG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSL | CVCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.63% | 11.19% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.70% | 13.36% | +9.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.26% | 17.40% | +18.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.35% | 21.71% | +8.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.37% | 26.00% | +3.37% |
Financials
CSL vs. CVCG.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carlisle Companies Incorporated and CVC Income & Growth Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSL vs. CVCG.L - Profitability Comparison
CSL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CVCG.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CVC Income & Growth Limited reported a gross profit of 20.13M and revenue of 20.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.3%.
CSL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported an operating income of 190.00M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.9%.
CVCG.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CVC Income & Growth Limited reported an operating income of -2.21M and revenue of 20.28M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.9%.
CSL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a net income of 127.40M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.
CVCG.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CVC Income & Growth Limited reported a net income of -4.16M and revenue of 20.28M, resulting in a net margin of -20.5%.