CSJZX vs. NMMGX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CSJZX (Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z) and NMMGX (Northern Multi-Manager Global Real Estate Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 5 years, CSJZX returned 3.96%/yr vs -0.20%/yr for NMMGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSJZX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for NMMGX.

Performance

CSJZX vs. NMMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z (CSJZX) and Northern Multi-Manager Global Real Estate Fund (NMMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSJZX achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly higher than NMMGX's 8.12% return.

CSJZX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -1.09%
• 6M: 13.97%
• YTD: 15.09%
• 1Y: 13.13%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: 3.96%
• 10Y*: —

NMMGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.30%
• 6M: 6.40%
• YTD: 8.12%
• 1Y: 10.34%
• 3Y*: 6.27%
• 5Y*: -0.20%
• 10Y*: 3.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSJZX vs. NMMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CSJZX Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z	15.09%	2.92%	6.62%	12.79%	-24.89%	42.37%	-5.11%	7.71%
NMMGX Northern Multi-Manager Global Real Estate Fund	8.12%	5.59%	-0.87%	9.85%	-26.25%	28.77%	-4.14%	6.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CSJZX and NMMGX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2019	0.90

The correlation between CSJZX and NMMGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CSJZX vs. NMMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSJZX

CSJZX Risk / Return Rank: 22
CSJZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CSJZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CSJZX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
CSJZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
CSJZX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

NMMGX

NMMGX Risk / Return Rank: 15
NMMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
NMMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
NMMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
NMMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
NMMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSJZX vs. NMMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z (CSJZX) and Northern Multi-Manager Global Real Estate Fund (NMMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSJZX	NMMGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	0.72	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	1.10	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.15	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	1.03	+0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.32	3.53	+0.80

CSJZX vs. NMMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSJZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the NMMGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSJZX and NMMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CSJZX vs. NMMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSJZX drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, roughly equal to the maximum NMMGX drawdown of -40.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSJZX and NMMGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSJZX	NMMGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.66%	-40.28%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.77%	-9.83%	+2.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.00%	-20.09%	+3.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.61%	-34.26%	+2.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.81%	-8.32%	+6.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.29%	-8.78%	-2.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	2.86%	+0.14%

Volatility

CSJZX vs. NMMGX - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z (CSJZX) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Northern Multi-Manager Global Real Estate Fund (NMMGX) at 3.84%. This indicates that CSJZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSJZX	NMMGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.92%	3.84%	+1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.24%	11.75%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.34%	14.04%	+0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.75%	17.17%	+1.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.90%	17.25%	+5.65%

CSJZX vs. NMMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSJZX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than NMMGX's 0.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSJZX vs. NMMGX - Dividend Comparison

CSJZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than NMMGX's 2.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSJZX Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z	2.64%	3.05%	2.82%	3.54%	7.57%	3.72%	2.58%	8.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NMMGX Northern Multi-Manager Global Real Estate Fund	2.92%	3.05%	2.39%	2.58%	1.04%	2.69%	1.77%	4.57%	6.04%	5.53%	15.47%	36.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSJZX and NMMGX in my portfolio?

CSJZX and NMMGX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSJZX or NMMGX?

CSJZX has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to NMMGX (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSJZX dropped -41.66% vs NMMGX's -40.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSJZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.