CSJZX vs. PHRAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CSJZX (Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z) and PHRAX (Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 5 years, CSJZX returned 3.96%/yr vs 3.87%/yr for PHRAX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CSJZX charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for PHRAX.

Performance

CSJZX vs. PHRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z (CSJZX) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund (PHRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSJZX having a 11.58% return and PHRAX slightly higher at 11.63%.

CSJZX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -0.94%
• YTD: 11.58%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 10.97%
• 3Y*: 10.55%
• 5Y*: 3.96%
• 10Y*: —

PHRAX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -1.30%
• YTD: 11.63%
• 6M: 10.47%
• 1Y: 11.41%
• 3Y*: 10.12%
• 5Y*: 3.87%
• 10Y*: 6.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSJZX vs. PHRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CSJZX Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z	11.58%	2.92%	6.62%	12.79%	-24.89%	42.37%	-5.11%	7.71%
PHRAX Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund	11.63%	0.23%	10.15%	10.98%	-26.33%	46.79%	-1.98%	6.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CSJZX and PHRAX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2019	0.97

The correlation between CSJZX and PHRAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CSJZX vs. PHRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSJZX

CSJZX Risk / Return Rank: 11
CSJZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
CSJZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CSJZX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
CSJZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
CSJZX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

PHRAX

PHRAX Risk / Return Rank: 12
PHRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
PHRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
PHRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
PHRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
PHRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSJZX vs. PHRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z (CSJZX) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund (PHRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSJZX	PHRAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	0.85	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.13	1.20	-0.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.15	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	1.42	-0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.56	4.15	-0.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSJZX vs. PHRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSJZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the PHRAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSJZX and PHRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSJZX	PHRAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	0.85	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.20	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.40	-0.13

Drawdowns

CSJZX vs. PHRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSJZX drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, smaller than the maximum PHRAX drawdown of -72.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSJZX and PHRAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSJZX	PHRAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.66%	-72.56%	+30.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.77%	-7.83%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.00%	-19.09%	+2.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.61%	-33.51%	+1.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.88%	-3.51%	+0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.45%	-11.37%	-0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	2.67%	+0.31%

Volatility

CSJZX vs. PHRAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z (CSJZX) is 3.69%, while Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund (PHRAX) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that CSJZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSJZX	PHRAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.69%	3.94%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.15%	9.43%	+0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.49%	13.12%	+0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.65%	19.08%	-0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.97%	20.98%	+1.99%

CSJZX vs. PHRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSJZX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than PHRAX's 1.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSJZX vs. PHRAX - Dividend Comparison

CSJZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than PHRAX's 5.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSJZX Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z	2.79%	3.05%	2.82%	3.54%	7.57%	3.72%	2.58%	8.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PHRAX Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund	5.30%	5.93%	8.39%	12.35%	11.12%	4.45%	5.58%	21.34%	19.03%	18.54%	21.22%	20.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSJZX and PHRAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, CSJZX and PHRAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CSJZX or PHRAX?

PHRAX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to CSJZX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSJZX dropped -41.66% vs PHRAX's -72.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PHRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.