PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMMGX vs. NSGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMMGX vs. NSGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Multi-Manager Global Real Estate Fund (NMMGX) and Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMMGX achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than NSGRX's 16.84% return. Over the past 10 years, NMMGX has underperformed NSGRX with an annualized return of 3.45%, while NSGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.87% annualized return.


NMMGX

1D
-2.75%
1M
-4.02%
YTD
4.18%
6M
4.47%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
5.68%
5Y*
-0.43%
10Y*
3.45%

NSGRX

1D
0.71%
1M
3.25%
YTD
16.84%
6M
16.28%
1Y
35.57%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
10.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMMGX vs. NSGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMMGX
Northern Multi-Manager Global Real Estate Fund
4.18%5.59%-0.87%9.85%-26.25%28.77%-4.14%23.71%-4.59%9.67%
NSGRX
Northern Small Cap Core Fund
16.84%10.57%10.44%16.96%-16.14%19.99%14.53%23.30%-10.22%13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between NMMGX and NSGRX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2008

0.70

The correlation between NMMGX and NSGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMMGX vs. NSGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMMGX
NMMGX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NMMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NMMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

NSGRX
NSGRX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NSGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
NSGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMMGX vs. NSGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Multi-Manager Global Real Estate Fund (NMMGX) and Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMMGXNSGRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

2.12

-1.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.80

3.03

-2.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.37

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

4.45

-3.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.56

15.55

-11.99

NMMGX vs. NSGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMMGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the NSGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMMGX and NSGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMMGXNSGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

2.12

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.32

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.47

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.34

+0.04

Drawdowns

NMMGX vs. NSGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMMGX drawdown since its inception was -40.28%, smaller than the maximum NSGRX drawdown of -64.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMMGX and NSGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMMGXNSGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.28%

-64.89%

+24.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-8.66%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.09%

-26.45%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.26%

-32.31%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.28%

-40.37%

+0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.65%

-0.21%

-11.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-22.17%

+13.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.45%

+0.27%

Volatility

NMMGX vs. NSGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Multi-Manager Global Real Estate Fund (NMMGX) is 4.24%, while Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that NMMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NSGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMMGXNSGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

4.93%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.20%

12.43%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.81%

18.13%

-4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.15%

23.36%

-6.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

23.38%

-6.08%

NMMGX vs. NSGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMMGX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than NSGRX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMMGX vs. NSGRX - Dividend Comparison

NMMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than NSGRX's 13.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMMGX
Northern Multi-Manager Global Real Estate Fund
2.68%3.05%2.39%2.58%1.04%2.69%1.77%4.57%6.04%5.53%15.47%36.84%
NSGRX
Northern Small Cap Core Fund
13.57%15.85%17.77%6.90%0.55%15.75%5.00%6.30%1.26%4.35%0.67%3.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMMGX and NSGRX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NSGRX has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to NMMGX (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMMGX dropped -40.28% vs NSGRX's -64.89%.

NSGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMMGX and NSGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer