PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CSJP.L vs. XDNS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CSJP.L vs. XDNS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CSJP.L (iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XDNS.L (Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from iShares and DWS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSJP.L returned 10.09%/yr vs 9.68%/yr for XDNS.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSJP.L charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XDNS.L.

Performance

CSJP.L vs. XDNS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSJP.L achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly higher than XDNS.L's 15.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSJP.L having a 10.09% annualized return and XDNS.L not far behind at 9.68%.

CSJP.L

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.26%
YTD
16.41%
6M
15.60%
1Y
34.17%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
10.09%

XDNS.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
6.27%
YTD
15.48%
6M
14.59%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSJP.L vs. XDNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		16.41%17.48%9.01%13.68%-7.33%1.76%12.16%13.94%-8.52%13.00%
XDNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D		15.48%16.58%9.87%11.58%-7.42%1.12%12.12%14.51%-10.22%14.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CSJP.L and XDNS.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2015

0.86

The correlation between CSJP.L and XDNS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (3 years) to 0.87 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CSJP.L vs. XDNS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CSJP.L
XDNS.L

Industrials

24.5%
25.8%

Technology

20.8%
19.8%

Financial Services

17.8%
18.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
11.3%

Communication Services

8.8%
8.8%

Healthcare

5.9%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
2.6%

Basic Materials

3.0%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.5%

Utilities

1.0%
0.6%

Energy

1.0%

-

Industrials

CSJP.L
24.5%
XDNS.L
25.8%

Technology

CSJP.L
20.8%
XDNS.L
19.8%

Financial Services

CSJP.L
17.8%
XDNS.L
18.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CSJP.L
11.9%
XDNS.L
11.3%

Communication Services

CSJP.L
8.8%
XDNS.L
8.8%

Healthcare

CSJP.L
5.9%
XDNS.L
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

CSJP.L
3.5%
XDNS.L
2.6%

Basic Materials

CSJP.L
3.0%
XDNS.L
3.2%

Real Estate

CSJP.L
1.9%
XDNS.L
2.5%

Utilities

CSJP.L
1.0%
XDNS.L
0.6%

Energy

CSJP.L
1.0%
XDNS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D

Often compared with CSJP.L:
CSJP.L vs. SJPA.LCSJP.L vs. LCJP.LCSJP.L vs. IJPN.LCSJP.L vs. PRIJ.LCSJP.L vs. XDJP.LCSJP.L vs. SUJA.LCSJP.L vs. PAXG.L
Often compared with XDNS.L:
XDNS.L vs. X7PP.LXDNS.L vs. XDJP.LXDNS.L vs. JPXNXDNS.L vs. IJPN.LXDNS.L vs. XBCU.LXDNS.L vs. XNNS.LXDNS.L vs. XCNA.L

Return for Risk

CSJP.L vs. XDNS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CSJP.L
CSJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CSJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
XDNS.L
XDNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XDNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSJP.L vs. XDNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CSJP.LXDNS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.85
2.09

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.66
2.91

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.81

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.33

11.43

-1.11

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSJP.L vs. XDNS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the XDNS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSJP.L and XDNS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CSJP.LXDNS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.09

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.68

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.66

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.60

+0.03

Drawdowns

CSJP.L vs. XDNS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSJP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.31%, roughly equal to the maximum XDNS.L drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSJP.L and XDNS.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CSJP.LXDNS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.31%

-24.75%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.49%

-10.70%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.32%

-14.32%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.68%

-19.29%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.31%

-24.75%

+0.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.57%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-5.35%

-0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

4.04%

-0.74%

Volatility

CSJP.L vs. XDNS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L) have volatilities of 3.77% and 3.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CSJP.LXDNS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

3.89%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

14.64%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.35%

19.56%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

17.83%

-1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.96%

17.31%

-1.35%

CSJP.L vs. XDNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSJP.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than XDNS.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSJP.L vs. XDNS.L - Dividend Comparison

CSJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CSJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D		1.43%1.63%1.65%1.81%2.83%1.46%1.79%1.77%1.20%1.97%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

CSJP.L and XDNS.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDNS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDNS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for CSJP.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for CSJP.L and 0.15% for XDNS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSJP.L and XDNS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer