CSJP.L vs. IJPN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IJPN.L).
CSJP.L and IJPN.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSJP.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the TOPIX TR JPY. It was launched on Jan 11, 2010. IJPN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the TOPIX TR JPY. It was launched on Oct 1, 2004. Both CSJP.L and IJPN.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSJP.L or IJPN.L.
Key characteristics
| CSJP.L | IJPN.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.68% | 7.71% |
| 1Y Return | 16.20% | 16.12% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.23% | 6.14% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.69% | 7.51% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.04% | 8.91% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.05 | 1.05 |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.42% | 14.34% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.31% | -43.24% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.73% | -4.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSJP.L and IJPN.L is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CSJP.L vs. IJPN.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSJP.L having a 7.68% return and IJPN.L slightly higher at 7.71%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSJP.L having a 9.04% annualized return and IJPN.L not far behind at 8.91%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSJP.L vs. IJPN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSJP.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than IJPN.L's 0.59% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSJP.L vs. IJPN.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IJPN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CSJP.L vs. IJPN.L - Dividend Comparison
CSJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IJPN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSJP.L iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJPN.L iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
CSJP.L vs. IJPN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSJP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.31%, smaller than the maximum IJPN.L drawdown of -43.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSJP.L and IJPN.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CSJP.L vs. IJPN.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IJPN.L) have volatilities of 5.14% and 5.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.