PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CSJP.L vs. CNX1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CSJP.L vs. CNX1.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CSJP.L (iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CNX1.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CSJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while CNX1.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSJP.L returned 10.09%/yr vs 22.43%/yr for CNX1.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSJP.L charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for CNX1.L.

Performance

CSJP.L vs. CNX1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSJP.L achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly lower than CNX1.L's 19.85% return. Over the past 10 years, CSJP.L has underperformed CNX1.L with an annualized return of 10.09%, while CNX1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.43% annualized return.

CSJP.L

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.26%
YTD
16.41%
6M
15.60%
1Y
34.17%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
10.09%

CNX1.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
9.63%
YTD
19.85%
6M
18.42%
1Y
41.69%
3Y*
24.68%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
22.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSJP.L vs. CNX1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		16.41%17.48%9.01%13.68%-7.33%1.76%12.16%13.94%-8.52%13.00%
CNX1.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		19.85%11.57%28.51%47.71%-25.53%29.50%43.24%33.63%4.62%20.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CSJP.L and CNX1.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.56

The correlation between CSJP.L and CNX1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CSJP.L vs. CNX1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CSJP.L
CNX1.L

Industrials

24.5%
2.8%

Technology

20.8%
57.3%

Financial Services

17.8%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
11.6%

Communication Services

8.8%
14.5%

Healthcare

5.9%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
6.9%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Utilities

1.0%
1.3%

Energy

1.0%
0.5%

Industrials

CSJP.L
24.5%
CNX1.L
2.8%

Technology

CSJP.L
20.8%
CNX1.L
57.3%

Financial Services

CSJP.L
17.8%
CNX1.L
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CSJP.L
11.9%
CNX1.L
11.6%

Communication Services

CSJP.L
8.8%
CNX1.L
14.5%

Healthcare

CSJP.L
5.9%
CNX1.L
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

CSJP.L
3.5%
CNX1.L
6.9%

Basic Materials

CSJP.L
3.0%
CNX1.L
1.1%

Real Estate

CSJP.L
1.9%
CNX1.L
0.1%

Utilities

CSJP.L
1.0%
CNX1.L
1.3%

Energy

CSJP.L
1.0%
CNX1.L
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with CSJP.L:
CSJP.L vs. SJPA.LCSJP.L vs. LCJP.LCSJP.L vs. IJPN.LCSJP.L vs. PRIJ.LCSJP.L vs. XDJP.LCSJP.L vs. SUJA.LCSJP.L vs. PAXG.L
Often compared with CNX1.L:
CNX1.L vs. CNDX.LCNX1.L vs. EQQQ.LCNX1.L vs. IITU.LCNX1.L vs. EQGB.LCNX1.L vs. QQQCNX1.L vs. XNAQ.LCNX1.L vs. SXRV.DE

Return for Risk

CSJP.L vs. CNX1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CSJP.L
CSJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CSJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
CNX1.L
CNX1.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSJP.L vs. CNX1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CSJP.LCNX1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.85
2.82

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.66
3.72

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.50

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.76

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.33

11.10

-0.77

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSJP.L vs. CNX1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSJP.L and CNX1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CSJP.LCNX1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.82

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.98

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

1.16

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.14

-0.51

Drawdowns

CSJP.L vs. CNX1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSJP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.31%, smaller than the maximum CNX1.L drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSJP.L and CNX1.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CSJP.LCNX1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.31%

-27.56%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.49%

-11.03%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.32%

-24.56%

+10.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.68%

-27.56%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.31%

-27.56%

+3.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.63%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-4.57%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

3.75%

-0.45%

Volatility

CSJP.L vs. CNX1.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) is 3.77%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that CSJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNX1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CSJP.LCNX1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

4.13%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

10.38%

+4.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.35%

14.70%

+3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

19.16%

-3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.96%

19.44%

-3.48%

CSJP.L vs. CNX1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSJP.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than CNX1.L's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSJP.L vs. CNX1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSJP.L nor CNX1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

CSJP.L and CNX1.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CNX1.L is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CNX1.L is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for CSJP.L.

CSJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while CNX1.L is Nasdaq-100. CSJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while CNX1.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for CSJP.L and 0.36% for CNX1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSJP.L and CNX1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer