CSIO vs. UFO
CSIO (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF) and UFO (Procure Space ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CSIO is actively managed, while UFO is passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSIO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UFO.
Performance
CSIO vs. UFO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSIO achieves a 15.51% return, which is significantly lower than UFO's 20.26% return.
CSIO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 15.51%
- 6M
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UFO
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- -24.91%
- YTD
- 20.26%
- 6M
- 16.27%
- 1Y
- 68.45%
- 3Y*
- 37.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- —
CSIO vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 15.51% | 0.82% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 20.26% | 6.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSIO and UFO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSIO vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank
CSIO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UFO
CSIO vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSIO | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.19 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.90 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSIO vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSIO drawdown since its inception was -5.86%, smaller than the maximum UFO drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIO and UFO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSIO | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -50.33% | +44.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -31.45% | +30.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.11% | -21.81% | +20.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.69% | — |
Volatility
CSIO vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSIO | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.35% | 40.84% | -29.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 30.68% | -19.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 31.18% | -19.83% |
CSIO vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSIO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSIO vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison
CSIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than UFO's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.36% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSIO and UFO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSIO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSIO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UFO.
CSIO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.36% for UFO.
They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and ProcureAM. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSIO and 0.75% for UFO.
Find the right allocation for CSIO and UFO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer