PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSIFX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CSIFX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Balanced Fund (CSIFX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CSIFX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CSIFX
Calvert Balanced Fund
-4.90%11.32%18.96%16.35%-1.79%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
-1.44%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSIFX achieves a -4.90% return, which is significantly lower than FRGAX's -1.44% return.


CSIFX

1D
1.91%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-4.90%
6M
-3.18%
1Y
8.27%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
8.70%

FRGAX

1D
2.16%
1M
-4.28%
YTD
-1.44%
6M
0.52%
1Y
15.52%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CSIFX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSIFX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CSIFX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSIFX
CSIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CSIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CSIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSIFX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Balanced Fund (CSIFX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSIFXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.77

1.33

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.16

1.93

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.28

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

1.74

-0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.52

7.96

-3.44

CSIFX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSIFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSIFX and FRGAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSIFXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

1.33

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

1.27

-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between CSIFX and FRGAX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CSIFX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

CSIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than FRGAX's 2.03% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSIFX
Calvert Balanced Fund
4.70%4.76%5.23%2.37%2.32%7.61%2.43%3.45%5.25%7.41%2.68%12.56%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
2.03%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CSIFX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSIFX drawdown since its inception was -38.68%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIFX and FRGAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CSIFXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.68%

-11.77%

-26.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.98%

-8.53%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.23%

-5.02%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-1.62%

-3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.87%

+0.17%

Volatility

CSIFX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Balanced Fund (CSIFX) is 4.06%, while Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that CSIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CSIFXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

4.51%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.64%

7.04%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.53%

12.09%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.87%

10.33%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.03%

10.33%

+0.70%