PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSIFX vs. FIQDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSIFX vs. FIQDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Balanced Fund (CSIFX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSIFX achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than FIQDX's 8.84% return.


CSIFX

1D
0.04%
1M
2.44%
YTD
4.11%
6M
3.75%
1Y
14.48%
3Y*
14.57%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
9.55%

FIQDX

1D
0.31%
1M
0.10%
YTD
8.84%
6M
9.09%
1Y
16.83%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSIFX vs. FIQDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CSIFX
Calvert Balanced Fund
4.11%11.32%18.96%16.35%-15.33%14.30%15.43%23.71%-7.30%
FIQDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z
8.84%10.40%6.03%4.55%-3.17%15.96%3.79%10.63%-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between CSIFX and FIQDX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2018

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between CSIFX and FIQDX has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSIFX vs. FIQDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSIFX
CSIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CSIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CSIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQDX
FIQDX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FIQDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSIFX vs. FIQDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Balanced Fund (CSIFX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSIFXFIQDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.73

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

8.62

-6.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.07

32.18

-24.12

CSIFX vs. FIQDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the FIQDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSIFX and FIQDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSIFXFIQDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

3.62

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.94

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.90

-0.20

Drawdowns

CSIFX vs. FIQDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSIFX drawdown since its inception was -38.68%, which is greater than FIQDX's maximum drawdown of -19.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIFX and FIQDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSIFXFIQDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.68%

-19.98%

-18.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.98%

-1.94%

-6.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.86%

-5.91%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.95%

-12.79%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.73%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-2.98%

-2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

0.52%

+1.31%

Volatility

CSIFX vs. FIQDX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Balanced Fund (CSIFX) has a higher volatility of 2.37% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX) at 1.32%. This indicates that CSIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIQDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSIFXFIQDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

1.32%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.74%

3.61%

+3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.45%

4.65%

+3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.89%

6.91%

+3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.07%

7.41%

+3.66%

CSIFX vs. FIQDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSIFX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQDX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSIFX vs. FIQDX - Dividend Comparison

CSIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than FIQDX's 4.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSIFX
Calvert Balanced Fund
4.29%4.76%5.23%2.37%2.32%7.61%2.43%3.45%5.25%7.41%2.68%12.56%
FIQDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z
4.19%4.75%4.88%5.38%7.39%5.44%2.29%3.17%8.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSIFX and FIQDX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSIFX has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to FIQDX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSIFX dropped -38.68% vs FIQDX's -19.98%.

FIQDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSIFX and FIQDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer