CSIEX vs. FSPGX
CSIEX (Calvert Equity Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CSIEX returned 4.09%/yr vs 16.03%/yr for FSPGX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSIEX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.
Performance
CSIEX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSIEX achieves a -9.20% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's 8.60% return.
CSIEX
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- -9.20%
- 6M
- -8.41%
- 1Y
- -6.46%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 4.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
FSPGX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 7.10%
- YTD
- 8.60%
- 6M
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- 25.53%
- 5Y*
- 16.03%
- 10Y*
- —
CSIEX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSIEX Calvert Equity Fund | -9.20% | 7.27% | 8.35% | 17.93% | -17.61% | 28.90% | 24.26% | 36.46% | 5.03% | 24.59% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 8.60% | 18.54% | 33.27% | 42.77% | -29.17% | 27.57% | 38.46% | 36.38% | -1.79% | 27.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSIEX and FSPGX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CSIEX and FSPGX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSIEX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
CSIEX
FSPGX
CSIEX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Equity Fund (CSIEX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSIEX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.32 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 1.76 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 5.90 | -6.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSIEX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 1.85 | -2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.75 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.90 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
CSIEX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSIEX drawdown since its inception was -50.81%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIEX and FSPGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSIEX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.81% | -32.66% | -18.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.12% | -16.17% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.87% | -23.32% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.71% | -32.66% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.38% | -0.38% | -11.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -6.37% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.93% | 4.81% | +1.12% |
Volatility
CSIEX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison
Calvert Equity Fund (CSIEX) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 3.32%. This indicates that CSIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSIEX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 3.32% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.57% | 11.58% | -2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.37% | 15.39% | -3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 21.49% | -5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 21.55% | -4.39% |
CSIEX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSIEX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSIEX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison
CSIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.29%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSIEX Calvert Equity Fund | 25.29% | 22.97% | 8.74% | 1.79% | 3.40% | 3.56% | 2.70% | 2.87% | 8.78% | 8.10% | 11.30% | 25.62% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.73% | 0.86% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSIEX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSIEX has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to FSPGX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSIEX dropped -50.81% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.
FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSIEX and FSPGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer