PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSHP vs. VBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSHP vs. VBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSHP achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly higher than VBIL's 1.50% return.


CSHP

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.93%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VBIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSHP vs. VBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CSHP and VBIL is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2025

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSHP vs. VBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSHP
CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

VBIL
VBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSHP vs. VBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSHPVBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

7.44

21.10

-13.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

65.71

42.61

+23.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

432.16

532.54

-100.38

CSHP vs. VBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSHP Sharpe Ratio is 11.91, which is comparable to the VBIL Sharpe Ratio of 15.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSHP and VBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSHPVBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91

15.17

-3.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

10.75

13.44

-2.69

Drawdowns

CSHP vs. VBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSHP drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, smaller than the maximum VBIL drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHP and VBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSHPVBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-0.09%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.06%

-0.09%

+0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-0.00%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.01%

0.00%

Volatility

CSHP vs. VBIL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) has a higher volatility of 0.07% compared to Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that CSHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSHPVBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

0.06%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.24%

0.16%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33%

0.26%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.40%

0.30%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.40%

0.30%

+0.10%

CSHP vs. VBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSHP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VBIL's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CSHP vs. VBIL - Dividend Comparison

CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than VBIL's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
3.92%5.39%1.96%
VBIL
Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
3.65%3.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSHP and VBIL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSHP has higher volatility (0.07%) compared to VBIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSHP dropped -0.08% vs VBIL's -0.09%.

On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.96% vs 3.93% for VBIL. On fees, VBIL is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.96% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBIL is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CSHP.

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 3.65% for VBIL.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CSHP and 0.07% for VBIL.

VBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.17 vs 11.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSHP and VBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer