CSHP vs. TFLR
CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) and TFLR (T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares, while TFLR is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CSHP returned 4.19% vs 4.91% for TFLR. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CSHP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TFLR.
Performance
CSHP vs. TFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSHP achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly higher than TFLR's 1.94% return.
CSHP
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.37%
TFLR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.42M | $7.30M | $2.63M | |
| $4.37M | $3.92M | $4.00M |
CSHP vs. TFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 2.53% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
TFLR T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF | 1.94% | 6.57% | 3.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSHP and TFLR is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | -0.04 |
The correlation between CSHP and TFLR shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSHP vs. TFLR — Risk / Return Rank
CSHP
TFLR
CSHP vs. TFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSHP | TFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.79 | 1.56 | +1.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.90 | 2.27 | +8.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 68.37 | 10.31 | +58.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSHP vs. TFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSHP drawdown since its inception was -0.39%, smaller than the maximum TFLR drawdown of -4.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHP and TFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSHP | TFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.39% | -4.01% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.39% | -2.18% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.11% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -0.21% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 0.48% | -0.42% |
Volatility
CSHP vs. TFLR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) has a higher volatility of 1.11% compared to T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) at 0.48%. This indicates that CSHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSHP | TFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 0.48% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.12% | 1.76% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15% | 2.01% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.86% | 3.61% | -2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.86% | 3.61% | -2.75% |
CSHP vs. TFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSHP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TFLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSHP vs. TFLR - Dividend Comparison
CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than TFLR's 6.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 4.10% | 5.39% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TFLR T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF | 6.68% | 6.93% | 8.18% | 7.76% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSHP and TFLR have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSHP has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to TFLR (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSHP dropped -0.39% vs TFLR's -4.01%.
On 1-year performance, TFLR leads with 4.91% vs 4.19% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, TFLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TFLR has performed better with a 4.91% return vs 4.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TFLR.
TFLR has the higher dividend yield at 6.68%, compared with 4.10% for CSHP.
CSHP is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while TFLR is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: iShares and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CSHP and 0.60% for TFLR.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSHP and TFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer