PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSHP vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CSHP vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CSHP vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
0.98%4.10%2.24%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
5.77%144.66%-3.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSHP achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 5.77% return.


CSHP

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.98%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SLV

1D
7.27%
1M
-19.83%
YTD
5.77%
6M
60.82%
1Y
119.88%
3Y*
45.50%
5Y*
24.10%
10Y*
16.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CSHP vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSHP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CSHP vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSHP
CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSHP vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSHPSLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

10.92

2.11

+8.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

27.40

2.20

+25.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

6.43

1.39

+5.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

58.55

2.82

+55.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

348.21

8.79

+339.41

CSHP vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSHP Sharpe Ratio is 10.92, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSHP and SLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSHPSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.92

2.11

+8.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

10.59

0.25

+10.34

Correlation

The correlation between CSHP and SLV is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CSHP vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
4.85%5.39%1.96%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CSHP vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSHP drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHP and SLV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CSHPSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-76.28%

+76.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.07%

-42.45%

+42.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-35.47%

+35.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-44.76%

+44.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

13.63%

-13.62%

Volatility

CSHP vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) is 0.15%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 18.91%. This indicates that CSHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CSHPSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.15%

18.91%

-18.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.26%

57.27%

-57.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38%

57.07%

-56.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.41%

35.28%

-34.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.41%

31.36%

-30.95%