PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSH2.L vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSH2.L vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSH2.L is traded in GBp, while SPHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPHD values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSH2.L achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 10.30% return. Over the past 10 years, CSH2.L has underperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 2.08%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.20% annualized return.


CSH2.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.83%
6M
2.08%
1Y
4.35%
3Y*
5.00%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
2.08%

SPHD

1D
1.19%
1M
4.58%
YTD
10.30%
6M
9.19%
1Y
15.40%
3Y*
10.08%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
8.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSH2.L vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSH2.L
Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP
1.83%4.67%5.61%4.72%1.54%0.13%0.30%0.82%0.70%0.42%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
10.30%-3.96%20.14%-3.75%12.54%26.17%-12.62%15.68%-0.61%2.23%

Correlation

The correlation between CSH2.L and SPHD is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSH2.L vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSH2.L
CSH2.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSH2.L vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSH2.LSPHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+13.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.50

1.22

+3.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

27.58

2.13

+25.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

161.52

5.25

+156.27

CSH2.L vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio is 8.16, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSH2.L and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSH2.L vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSH2.L drawdown since its inception was -0.37%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -34.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH2.L and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSH2.LSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-34.51%

+34.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.16%

-6.91%

+6.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.29%

-14.43%

+14.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.29%

-17.64%

+17.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.37%

-34.51%

+34.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.52%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-5.71%

+5.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

2.80%

-2.77%

Volatility

CSH2.L vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) is 0.08%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that CSH2.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSH2.LSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.08%

3.54%

-3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.24%

8.59%

-8.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53%

11.31%

-10.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.56%

13.75%

-13.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.44%

17.86%

-17.42%

CSH2.L vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSH2.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSH2.L vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSH2.L
Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.40%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSH2.L and SPHD have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSH2.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSH2.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.

CSH2.L is categorized as Money Market, while SPHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSH2.L and 0.30% for SPHD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSH2.L and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer