CSH.PA vs. LOGS.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CSH.PA (Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc) and LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CSH.PA is a Money Market fund tracking the Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index, while LOGS.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSH.PA returned 0.92%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for LOGS.DE. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. CSH.PA charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LOGS.DE.

Performance

CSH.PA vs. LOGS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSH.PA achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than LOGS.DE's 31.31% return. Over the past 10 years, CSH.PA has underperformed LOGS.DE with an annualized return of 0.92%, while LOGS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.

CSH.PA

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 0.78%
• 6M: 0.98%
• 1Y: 1.99%
• 3Y*: 2.96%
• 5Y*: 1.89%
• 10Y*: 0.92%

LOGS.DE

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: -4.69%
• YTD: 31.31%
• 6M: 30.73%
• 1Y: 64.25%
• 3Y*: 24.55%
• 5Y*: 21.48%
• 10Y*: 12.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSH.PA vs. LOGS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc	0.78%	2.25%	3.69%	3.22%	-0.06%	-0.65%	1.93%	-0.61%	-0.55%	-0.45%
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc	31.31%	44.49%	-2.07%	2.19%	28.95%	21.06%	-21.75%	4.34%	5.49%	2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CSH.PA and LOGS.DE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008	-0.01

Return for Risk

CSH.PA vs. LOGS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSH.PA

CSH.PA Risk / Return Rank: 97
CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CSH.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CSH.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CSH.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CSH.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

LOGS.DE

LOGS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 94
LOGS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LOGS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LOGS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 92
LOGS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LOGS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSH.PA vs. LOGS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSH.PA	LOGS.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.96	3.73	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.62	4.53	+2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.96	1.62	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.24	9.83	+1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	57.34	34.29	+23.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSH.PA vs. LOGS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is comparable to the LOGS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSH.PA and LOGS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSH.PA	LOGS.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.96	3.73	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	5.28	0.98	+4.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.41	0.51	+0.90
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.24	+0.54

Drawdowns

CSH.PA vs. LOGS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSH.PA drawdown since its inception was -3.73%, smaller than the maximum LOGS.DE drawdown of -56.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH.PA and LOGS.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSH.PA	LOGS.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.73%	-56.42%	+52.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.18%	-6.50%	+6.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.18%	-21.16%	+20.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.77%	-21.16%	+20.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-2.27%	-56.42%	+54.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.69%	+4.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-15.22%	+14.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	1.87%	-1.84%

Volatility

CSH.PA vs. LOGS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) is 0.09%, while Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that CSH.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOGS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSH.PA	LOGS.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.09%	6.06%	-5.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.41%	13.34%	-12.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50%	17.18%	-16.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.35%	21.72%	-21.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.64%	24.09%	-23.45%

CSH.PA vs. LOGS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSH.PA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LOGS.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSH.PA vs. LOGS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSH.PA nor LOGS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	0.05%	2.60%
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSH.PA and LOGS.DE in my portfolio?

CSH.PA and LOGS.DE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CSH.PA or LOGS.DE?

On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSH.PA or LOGS.DE?

CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LOGS.DE.

What is the main difference between CSH.PA and LOGS.DE?

CSH.PA is categorized as Money Market, while LOGS.DE is Energy Equities. CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index, while LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSH.PA and 0.30% for LOGS.DE.