CSH.PA vs. DCAM.PA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CSH.PA (Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc) and DCAM.PA (Amundi PEA Monde (MSCI World) UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CSH.PA is a Money Market fund tracking the Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index, while DCAM.PA is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CSH.PA returned 1.99% vs 22.78% for DCAM.PA. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. CSH.PA charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DCAM.PA.

Performance

CSH.PA vs. DCAM.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and Amundi PEA Monde (MSCI World) UCITS ETF Acc (DCAM.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSH.PA achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than DCAM.PA's 10.98% return.

CSH.PA

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 0.78%
• 6M: 0.98%
• 1Y: 1.99%
• 3Y*: 2.96%
• 5Y*: 1.89%
• 10Y*: 0.92%

DCAM.PA

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 4.83%
• YTD: 10.98%
• 6M: 11.26%
• 1Y: 22.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSH.PA vs. DCAM.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc	0.78%	1.74%
DCAM.PA Amundi PEA Monde (MSCI World) UCITS ETF Acc	10.98%	15.54%

Correlation

The correlation between CSH.PA and DCAM.PA is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025	-0.03

Return for Risk

CSH.PA vs. DCAM.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSH.PA

CSH.PA Risk / Return Rank: 97
CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CSH.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CSH.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CSH.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CSH.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

DCAM.PA

DCAM.PA Risk / Return Rank: 67
DCAM.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
DCAM.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
DCAM.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DCAM.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
DCAM.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSH.PA vs. DCAM.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and Amundi PEA Monde (MSCI World) UCITS ETF Acc (DCAM.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSH.PA	DCAM.PA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.96	2.07	+1.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.62	2.90	+3.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.96	1.39	+0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.24	3.44	+7.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	57.34	13.80	+43.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSH.PA vs. DCAM.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is higher than the DCAM.PA Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSH.PA and DCAM.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSH.PA	DCAM.PA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.96	2.07	+1.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	5.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	1.46	-0.67

Drawdowns

CSH.PA vs. DCAM.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSH.PA drawdown since its inception was -3.73%, smaller than the maximum DCAM.PA drawdown of -15.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH.PA and DCAM.PA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSH.PA	DCAM.PA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.73%	-15.45%	+11.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.18%	-6.54%	+6.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-2.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.33%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-1.72%	+0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	1.64%	-1.61%

Volatility

CSH.PA vs. DCAM.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) is 0.09%, while Amundi PEA Monde (MSCI World) UCITS ETF Acc (DCAM.PA) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that CSH.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCAM.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSH.PA	DCAM.PA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.09%	2.63%	-2.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.41%	7.62%	-7.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50%	10.89%	-10.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.35%	15.20%	-14.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.64%	15.20%	-14.56%

CSH.PA vs. DCAM.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSH.PA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DCAM.PA's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CSH.PA vs. DCAM.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSH.PA nor DCAM.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	0.05%	2.60%
DCAM.PA Amundi PEA Monde (MSCI World) UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSH.PA and DCAM.PA in my portfolio?

CSH.PA and DCAM.PA have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CSH.PA or DCAM.PA?

On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSH.PA or DCAM.PA?

CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for DCAM.PA.

What is the main difference between CSH.PA and DCAM.PA?

CSH.PA is categorized as Money Market, while DCAM.PA is Global Equities. CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index, while DCAM.PA tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSH.PA and 0.20% for DCAM.PA.