DCAM.PA vs. LQQ.PA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DCAM.PA (Amundi PEA Monde (MSCI World) UCITS ETF Acc) and LQQ.PA (Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage) are both exchange-traded funds - DCAM.PA is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while LQQ.PA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100® Leverage (2x) index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DCAM.PA returned 23.64% vs 82.41% for LQQ.PA. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DCAM.PA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LQQ.PA.

Performance

DCAM.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi PEA Monde (MSCI World) UCITS ETF Acc (DCAM.PA) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCAM.PA achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly lower than LQQ.PA's 41.91% return.

DCAM.PA

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 5.65%
• YTD: 11.03%
• 6M: 11.59%
• 1Y: 23.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQQ.PA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 22.95%
• YTD: 41.91%
• 6M: 38.66%
• 1Y: 82.41%
• 3Y*: 46.17%
• 5Y*: 27.25%
• 10Y*: 35.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCAM.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DCAM.PA Amundi PEA Monde (MSCI World) UCITS ETF Acc	11.03%	15.54%
LQQ.PA Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage	41.91%	47.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DCAM.PA and LQQ.PA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025	0.88

The correlation between DCAM.PA and LQQ.PA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DCAM.PA vs. LQQ.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCAM.PA

DCAM.PA Risk / Return Rank: 69
DCAM.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
DCAM.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
DCAM.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 68
DCAM.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
DCAM.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 75

LQQ.PA

LQQ.PA Risk / Return Rank: 71
LQQ.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
LQQ.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
LQQ.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 68
LQQ.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
LQQ.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCAM.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA Monde (MSCI World) UCITS ETF Acc (DCAM.PA) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DCAM.PA	LQQ.PA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	2.65	-0.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	3.22	-0.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.42	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	3.71	-0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.26	11.58	+2.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DCAM.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCAM.PA Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the LQQ.PA Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCAM.PA and LQQ.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DCAM.PA	LQQ.PA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	2.65	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.47	0.70	+0.77

Drawdowns

DCAM.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCAM.PA drawdown since its inception was -15.45%, smaller than the maximum LQQ.PA drawdown of -75.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCAM.PA and LQQ.PA.

Drawdown Indicators

	DCAM.PA	LQQ.PA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.45%	-75.86%	+60.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.54%	-21.88%	+15.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-44.33%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	0.00%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.72%	-15.73%	+14.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	7.05%	-5.41%

Volatility

DCAM.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi PEA Monde (MSCI World) UCITS ETF Acc (DCAM.PA) is 2.81%, while Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that DCAM.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQQ.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DCAM.PA	LQQ.PA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.81%	9.07%	-6.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.62%	22.31%	-14.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.95%	30.82%	-19.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.22%	39.79%	-24.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.22%	38.87%	-23.65%

DCAM.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCAM.PA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LQQ.PA's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DCAM.PA vs. LQQ.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither DCAM.PA nor LQQ.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DCAM.PA and LQQ.PA in my portfolio?

DCAM.PA and LQQ.PA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DCAM.PA or LQQ.PA?

On fees, DCAM.PA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DCAM.PA or LQQ.PA?

DCAM.PA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LQQ.PA.

What is the main difference between DCAM.PA and LQQ.PA?

DCAM.PA is categorized as Global Equities, while LQQ.PA is Nasdaq-100. DCAM.PA tracks MSCI World Index, while LQQ.PA tracks Nasdaq 100® Leverage (2x) index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DCAM.PA and 0.60% for LQQ.PA.