PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSH.PA vs. AMEL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSH.PA vs. AMEL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSH.PA achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than AMEL.DE's 13.84% return. Over the past 10 years, CSH.PA has underperformed AMEL.DE with an annualized return of 0.92%, while AMEL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.05% annualized return.


CSH.PA

1D
0.01%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.78%
6M
0.94%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
2.96%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*
0.92%

AMEL.DE

1D
3.30%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
13.84%
6M
14.72%
1Y
37.57%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
8.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSH.PA vs. AMEL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc
0.78%2.25%3.69%3.22%-0.06%-0.65%1.93%-0.61%-0.55%-0.45%
AMEL.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR
13.84%38.05%-22.20%28.15%16.33%-3.25%-21.25%20.70%-3.30%8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CSH.PA and AMEL.DE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2011

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSH.PA vs. AMEL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSH.PA
CSH.PA Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

AMEL.DE
AMEL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSH.PA vs. AMEL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSH.PAAMEL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.96

1.34

+0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.24

2.84

+8.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

57.34

9.36

+47.98

CSH.PA vs. AMEL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is higher than the AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSH.PA and AMEL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSH.PA vs. AMEL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSH.PA drawdown since its inception was -3.73%, smaller than the maximum AMEL.DE drawdown of -52.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH.PA and AMEL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSH.PAAMEL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-52.71%

+48.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.18%

-13.17%

+12.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.18%

-25.37%

+25.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.75%

-25.37%

+24.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-2.26%

-51.33%

+49.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.43%

+8.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-17.87%

+16.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

4.00%

-3.97%

Volatility

CSH.PA vs. AMEL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) is 0.09%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that CSH.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSH.PAAMEL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

6.66%

-6.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.41%

15.86%

-15.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50%

18.76%

-18.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.35%

21.00%

-20.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.64%

25.29%

-24.65%

CSH.PA vs. AMEL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSH.PA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than AMEL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CSH.PA vs. AMEL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSH.PA nor AMEL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
AMEL.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.05%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSH.PA and AMEL.DE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AMEL.DE.

CSH.PA is categorized as Money Market, while AMEL.DE is Latin America Equities. CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index, while AMEL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSH.PA and 0.20% for AMEL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSH.PA and AMEL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer