PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSH-UN.TO vs. FFN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CSH-UN.TO vs. FFN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Chartwell Retirement Residences (CSH-UN.TO) and North American Financial 15 Split Corp. (FFN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CSH-UN.TO vs. FFN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSH-UN.TO
Chartwell Retirement Residences
-1.62%37.84%34.64%47.82%-24.26%11.10%-14.52%5.88%-12.56%15.19%
FFN.TO
North American Financial 15 Split Corp.
-13.65%67.71%93.70%8.74%-38.50%119.88%-38.82%66.25%-42.19%9.18%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSH-UN.TO:

CA$6.12B

FFN.TO:

CA$509.83M

EPS

CSH-UN.TO:

CA$0.10

FFN.TO:

CA$7.60

PE Ratio

CSH-UN.TO:

200.74

FFN.TO:

1.07

PEG Ratio

CSH-UN.TO:

1.79

FFN.TO:

0.04

PS Ratio

CSH-UN.TO:

5.33

FFN.TO:

1.04

PB Ratio

CSH-UN.TO:

3.58

FFN.TO:

0.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSH-UN.TO:

CA$1.11B

FFN.TO:

CA$465.06M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSH-UN.TO:

CA$312.56M

FFN.TO:

CA$375.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

CSH-UN.TO:

CA$392.70M

FFN.TO:

CA$196.23M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSH-UN.TO achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly higher than FFN.TO's -13.65% return. Over the past 10 years, CSH-UN.TO has underperformed FFN.TO with an annualized return of 8.60%, while FFN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.37% annualized return.


CSH-UN.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-11.43%
YTD
-1.62%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
20.74%
3Y*
37.87%
5Y*
16.14%
10Y*
8.60%

FFN.TO

1D
0.74%
1M
-10.43%
YTD
-13.65%
6M
8.61%
1Y
58.47%
3Y*
42.01%
5Y*
17.96%
10Y*
16.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSH-UN.TO vs. FFN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSH-UN.TO
CSH-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CSH-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FFN.TO
FFN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FFN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FFN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSH-UN.TO vs. FFN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Retirement Residences (CSH-UN.TO) and North American Financial 15 Split Corp. (FFN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSH-UN.TOFFN.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

2.04

-1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.54

2.49

-0.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.43

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.82

-1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.19

10.22

-4.04

CSH-UN.TO vs. FFN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSH-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the FFN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSH-UN.TO and FFN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSH-UN.TOFFN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

2.04

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.51

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.40

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

Correlation

The correlation between CSH-UN.TO and FFN.TO is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CSH-UN.TO vs. FFN.TO - Dividend Comparison

CSH-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than FFN.TO's 15.23% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSH-UN.TO
Chartwell Retirement Residences
3.11%3.04%4.06%5.22%7.25%5.18%5.45%4.30%4.29%3.52%3.79%4.32%
FFN.TO
North American Financial 15 Split Corp.
15.23%14.01%17.88%5.12%13.39%18.23%6.63%17.84%24.94%13.79%7.69%14.23%

Drawdowns

CSH-UN.TO vs. FFN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSH-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.53%, smaller than the maximum FFN.TO drawdown of -100.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH-UN.TO and FFN.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CSH-UN.TOFFN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.53%

-100.08%

+20.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.88%

-21.05%

+9.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.92%

-64.95%

+25.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.16%

-66.99%

+11.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.43%

-100.07%

+88.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.85%

-93.03%

+77.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

5.80%

-2.38%

Volatility

CSH-UN.TO vs. FFN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chartwell Retirement Residences (CSH-UN.TO) is 7.43%, while North American Financial 15 Split Corp. (FFN.TO) has a volatility of 14.74%. This indicates that CSH-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CSH-UN.TOFFN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

14.74%

-7.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

19.97%

-4.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.03%

28.79%

-7.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.79%

35.51%

-14.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.17%

41.55%

-17.38%

Financials

CSH-UN.TO vs. FFN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chartwell Retirement Residences and North American Financial 15 Split Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
300.29M
15.83M
(CSH-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(FFN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items