Correlation
The correlation between CSH-UN.TO and L.TO is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
CSH-UN.TO vs. L.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Chartwell Retirement Residences (CSH-UN.TO) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSH-UN.TO or L.TO.
Performance
CSH-UN.TO vs. L.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
CSH-UN.TO:
3.02
L.TO:
2.85
CSH-UN.TO:
4.04
L.TO:
3.65
CSH-UN.TO:
1.49
L.TO:
1.51
CSH-UN.TO:
5.76
L.TO:
4.95
CSH-UN.TO:
18.00
L.TO:
14.35
CSH-UN.TO:
3.27%
L.TO:
3.57%
CSH-UN.TO:
19.29%
L.TO:
17.67%
CSH-UN.TO:
-82.41%
L.TO:
-65.60%
CSH-UN.TO:
0.00%
L.TO:
-0.25%
Fundamentals
CSH-UN.TO:
CA$5.26B
L.TO:
CA$69.23B
CSH-UN.TO:
CA$0.21
L.TO:
CA$7.18
CSH-UN.TO:
88.62
L.TO:
32.25
CSH-UN.TO:
5.74
L.TO:
1.12
CSH-UN.TO:
4.43
L.TO:
6.30
CSH-UN.TO:
CA$904.88M
L.TO:
CA$61.57B
CSH-UN.TO:
CA$327.65M
L.TO:
CA$19.89B
CSH-UN.TO:
CA$187.20M
L.TO:
CA$3.77B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSH-UN.TO achieves a 25.24% return, which is significantly higher than L.TO's 22.73% return. Over the past 10 years, CSH-UN.TO has underperformed L.TO with an annualized return of 10.40%, while L.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.82% annualized return.
CSH-UN.TO
25.24%
7.80%
17.33%
58.04%
20.71%
24.30%
10.40%
L.TO
22.73%
3.45%
28.11%
50.25%
27.54%
29.93%
17.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSH-UN.TO vs. L.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CSH-UN.TO
L.TO
CSH-UN.TO vs. L.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Retirement Residences (CSH-UN.TO) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
CSH-UN.TO vs. L.TO - Dividend Comparison
CSH-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than L.TO's 0.94% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSH-UN.TO Chartwell Retirement Residences | 3.49% | 3.98% | 5.19% | 7.25% | 5.18% | 5.45% | 4.30% | 4.29% | 3.53% | 2.58% | 0.08% | 0.09% |
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited | 0.94% | 1.18% | 1.57% | 1.55% | 1.61% | 2.45% | 2.22% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CSH-UN.TO vs. L.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSH-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -82.41%, which is greater than L.TO's maximum drawdown of -65.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH-UN.TO and L.TO.
Loading data...
Volatility
CSH-UN.TO vs. L.TO - Volatility Comparison
Chartwell Retirement Residences (CSH-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) at 5.99%. This indicates that CSH-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than L.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
CSH-UN.TO vs. L.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chartwell Retirement Residences and Loblaw Companies Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSH-UN.TO vs. L.TO - Profitability Comparison
CSH-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chartwell Retirement Residences reported a gross profit of 101.43M and revenue of 251.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
L.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a gross profit of 4.62B and revenue of 14.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.
CSH-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chartwell Retirement Residences reported an operating income of 31.19M and revenue of 251.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.
L.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Loblaw Companies Limited reported an operating income of 906.00M and revenue of 14.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
CSH-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chartwell Retirement Residences reported a net income of 33.18M and revenue of 251.48M, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.
L.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a net income of 503.00M and revenue of 14.14B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.