PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSGS vs. TEL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CSGS vs. TEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CSG Systems International, Inc. (CSGS) and TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSGS achieves a 5.67% return, which is significantly higher than TEL's -3.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CSGS has underperformed TEL with an annualized return of 8.86%, while TEL has yielded a comparatively higher 15.80% annualized return.


CSGS

1D
0.00%
1M
0.44%
YTD
5.67%
6M
5.11%
1Y
29.59%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
8.86%

TEL

1D
1.70%
1M
6.80%
YTD
-3.34%
6M
-4.72%
1Y
36.74%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
15.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSGS vs. TEL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSGS
CSG Systems International, Inc.
5.67%52.96%-1.48%-4.92%1.10%30.55%-11.06%66.01%-25.96%-7.68%
TEL
TE Connectivity Ltd.
-3.34%61.60%3.51%24.62%-27.66%35.12%28.95%29.37%-18.87%39.88%

Correlation

The correlation between CSGS and TEL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2007

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between CSGS and TEL has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSGS:

$2.33B

TEL:

$64.43B

EPS

CSGS:

$2.24

TEL:

$9.78

PE Ratio

CSGS:

35.97

TEL:

22.32

PEG Ratio

CSGS:

6.43

TEL:

4.13

PS Ratio

CSGS:

1.85

TEL:

3.50

PB Ratio

CSGS:

7.93

TEL:

4.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSGS:

$1.24B

TEL:

$18.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSGS:

$598.18M

TEL:

$6.55B

EBITDA (TTM)

CSGS:

$178.63M

TEL:

$4.47B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSGS vs. TEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSGS
CSGS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CSGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSGS Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CSGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSGS Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

TEL
TEL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEL Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
TEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSGS vs. TEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSG Systems International, Inc. (CSGS) and TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSGSTELDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.23

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

1.77

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.10

4.12

+5.98

CSGS vs. TEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the TEL Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSGS and TEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSGSTELDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.11

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.40

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.56

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.39

-0.25

Drawdowns

CSGS vs. TEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSGS drawdown since its inception was -88.60%, which is greater than TEL's maximum drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSGS and TEL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSGSTELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.60%

-81.07%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.98%

-20.85%

+12.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.64%

-22.60%

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.75%

-34.26%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.75%

-47.71%

+10.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.48%

+11.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.18%

-13.63%

-33.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

8.95%

-6.33%

Volatility

CSGS vs. TEL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CSG Systems International, Inc. (CSGS) is 0.47%, while TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) has a volatility of 9.56%. This indicates that CSGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSGSTELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

9.56%

-9.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.88%

27.32%

-23.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.36%

33.28%

-11.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.86%

27.94%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.68%

28.31%

-0.63%

Dividends

CSGS vs. TEL - Dividend Comparison

CSGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than TEL's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSGS
CSG Systems International, Inc.
1.61%1.67%2.35%2.10%1.85%1.74%2.09%1.72%2.64%1.80%1.53%1.95%
TEL
TE Connectivity Ltd.
1.33%1.22%1.78%1.66%1.90%1.23%1.57%1.90%2.27%1.65%2.08%1.98%

Financials

CSGS vs. TEL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CSG Systems International, Inc. and TE Connectivity Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
313.73M
4.74B
(CSGS) Total Revenue
(TEL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CSGS vs. TEL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CSG Systems International, Inc. and TE Connectivity Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
48.4%
36.8%
Portfolio components
CSGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSG Systems International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 151.93M and revenue of 313.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.

TEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

CSGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSG Systems International, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.07M and revenue of 313.73M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.

TEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

CSGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSG Systems International, Inc. reported a net income of 23.89M and revenue of 313.73M, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.

TEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported a net income of 855.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSGS and TEL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEL has higher volatility (9.56%) compared to CSGS (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSGS dropped -88.60% vs TEL's -81.07%.

CSGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSGS and TEL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer