PortfoliosLab logo
CSGS vs. NNE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CSGS and NNE is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CSGS vs. NNE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CSG Systems International, Inc. (CSGS) and NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CSGS:

2.07

NNE:

1.95

Sortino Ratio

CSGS:

3.31

NNE:

3.59

Omega Ratio

CSGS:

1.39

NNE:

1.40

Calmar Ratio

CSGS:

1.61

NNE:

7.82

Martin Ratio

CSGS:

10.86

NNE:

15.15

Ulcer Index

CSGS:

5.45%

NNE:

40.11%

Daily Std Dev

CSGS:

27.96%

NNE:

183.79%

Max Drawdown

CSGS:

-88.60%

NNE:

-77.68%

Current Drawdown

CSGS:

-1.20%

NNE:

-30.04%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSGS:

$1.92B

NNE:

$1.20B

EPS

CSGS:

$2.92

NNE:

-$0.97

PS Ratio

CSGS:

1.60

NNE:

0.00

PB Ratio

CSGS:

6.74

NNE:

9.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSGS:

$1.20B

NNE:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSGS:

$585.16M

NNE:

-$42.02K

EBITDA (TTM)

CSGS:

$207.04M

NNE:

$22.48B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSGS achieves a 28.99% return, which is significantly higher than NNE's 25.09% return.


CSGS

YTD

28.99%

1M

8.45%

6M

21.45%

1Y

57.44%

3Y*

4.46%

5Y*

9.06%

10Y*

9.65%

NNE

YTD

25.09%

1M

33.82%

6M

16.32%

1Y

350.65%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CSG Systems International, Inc.

NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CSGS vs. NNE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CSGS is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CSGS is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CSGS is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CSGS is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CSGS is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CSGS is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

NNE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NNE is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NNE is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NNE is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NNE is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NNE is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NNE is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CSGS vs. NNE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSG Systems International, Inc. (CSGS) and NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CSGS Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the NNE Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSGS and NNE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CSGS vs. NNE - Dividend Comparison

CSGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, while NNE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CSGS
CSG Systems International, Inc.
1.86%2.35%2.10%1.85%1.74%2.09%1.72%2.64%1.81%1.53%1.95%2.49%
NNE
NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CSGS vs. NNE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSGS drawdown since its inception was -88.60%, which is greater than NNE's maximum drawdown of -77.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSGS and NNE.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CSGS vs. NNE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CSG Systems International, Inc. (CSGS) is 8.52%, while NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) has a volatility of 33.44%. This indicates that CSGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NNE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CSGS vs. NNE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CSG Systems International, Inc. and NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20212022202320242025
299.45M
0
(CSGS) Total Revenue
(NNE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items