CSGP vs. CPRT
CSGP (CoStar Group, Inc.) and CPRT (Copart, Inc.) are both stocks. CSGP operates in Real Estate - Services (Real Estate), while CPRT operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CSGP returned 4.54%/yr vs 17.57%/yr for CPRT. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSGP vs. CPRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSGP achieves a -51.16% return, which is significantly lower than CPRT's -21.46% return. Over the past 10 years, CSGP has underperformed CPRT with an annualized return of 4.54%, while CPRT has yielded a comparatively higher 17.57% annualized return.
CSGP
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- -51.16%
- 6M
- -51.87%
- 1Y
- -59.54%
- 3Y*
- -26.28%
- 5Y*
- -17.70%
- 10Y*
- 4.54%
CPRT
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- YTD
- -21.46%
- 6M
- -20.48%
- 1Y
- -36.72%
- 3Y*
- -10.83%
- 5Y*
- -0.30%
- 10Y*
- 17.57%
CSGP vs. CPRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSGP CoStar Group, Inc. | -51.16% | -6.08% | -18.08% | 13.08% | -2.21% | -14.50% | 54.48% | 77.36% | 13.60% | 57.54% |
CPRT Copart, Inc. | -21.46% | -31.78% | 17.12% | 60.95% | -19.68% | 19.15% | 39.93% | 90.33% | 10.63% | 55.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSGP and CPRT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1998 | 0.37 |
The correlation between CSGP and CPRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CSGP:
$13.60B
CPRT:
$29.68B
CSGP:
$0.06
CPRT:
$1.59
CSGP:
544.46
CPRT:
19.28
CSGP:
4.04
CPRT:
6.46
CSGP:
1.72
CPRT:
3.38
CSGP:
$3.41B
CPRT:
$4.64B
CSGP:
$2.64B
CPRT:
$2.11B
CSGP:
$284.20M
CPRT:
$2.00B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSGP vs. CPRT — Risk / Return Rank
CSGP
CPRT
CSGP vs. CPRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Copart, Inc. (CPRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSGP | CPRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.66 | 0.71 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | -0.98 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | -1.75 | +0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSGP vs. CPRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSGP drawdown since its inception was -71.11%, roughly equal to the maximum CPRT drawdown of -72.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSGP and CPRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSGP | CPRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.11% | -72.49% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.11% | -39.26% | -27.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.41% | -52.46% | -14.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.07% | -52.46% | -15.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.07% | -52.46% | -15.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.07% | -51.83% | -15.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.29% | -16.57% | -5.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.50% | 22.06% | +17.44% |
Volatility
CSGP vs. CPRT - Volatility Comparison
CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to Copart, Inc. (CPRT) at 8.74%. This indicates that CSGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSGP | CPRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.56% | 8.74% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.06% | 18.69% | +15.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.69% | 23.70% | +14.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.68% | 25.94% | +8.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.63% | 27.43% | +5.20% |
Dividends
CSGP vs. CPRT - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSGP nor CPRT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CSGP vs. CPRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoStar Group, Inc. and Copart, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSGP vs. CPRT - Profitability Comparison
CSGP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoStar Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 701.00M and revenue of 897.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.2%.
CPRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Copart, Inc. reported a gross profit of 572.60M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.3%.
CSGP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoStar Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.00M and revenue of 897.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
CPRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Copart, Inc. reported an operating income of 464.28M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.5%.
CSGP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoStar Group, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00M and revenue of 897.00M, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.
CPRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Copart, Inc. reported a net income of 402.40M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 32.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSGP and CPRT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSGP has higher volatility (9.56%) compared to CPRT (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSGP dropped -71.11% vs CPRT's -72.49%.
CSGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.56 vs -1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSGP and CPRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer