CSG.AS vs. GPIQ
Compare and contrast key facts about CSG N.V (CSG.AS) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ).
GPIQ is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Oct 24, 2023.
Performance
CSG.AS vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSG.AS vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CSG.AS CSG N.V | -6.64% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | -3.55% |
Different Trading Currencies
CSG.AS is traded in EUR, while GPIQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GPIQ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
CSG.AS
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -26.67%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPIQ
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -2.37%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSG.AS vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
CSG.AS
GPIQ
CSG.AS vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSG N.V (CSG.AS) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSG.AS | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 0.95 | -1.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSG.AS and GPIQ is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CSG.AS vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
CSG.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GPIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CSG.AS CSG N.V | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 10.68% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
CSG.AS vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSG.AS drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -25.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSG.AS and GPIQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSG.AS | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.29% | -21.06% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.29% | -6.63% | -22.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.41% | -2.37% | -8.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility
CSG.AS vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSG.AS | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.43% | 22.72% | +72.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.43% | 19.12% | +76.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.43% | 19.12% | +76.31% |