CSEX vs. RGTU

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CSEX (Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF) and RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

CSEX vs. RGTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF (CSEX) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSEX achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly higher than RGTU's -55.83% return.

CSEX

• 1D: 6.05%
• 1M: -10.41%
• YTD: 7.63%
• 6M: -1.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RGTU

• 1D: -16.33%
• 1M: -52.54%
• YTD: -55.83%
• 6M: -64.36%
• 1Y: -20.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSEX vs. RGTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CSEX Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF	7.63%	-19.20%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-55.83%	-47.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CSEX and RGTU is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

CSEX vs. RGTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSEX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RGTU

RGTU Risk / Return Rank: 17
RGTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RGTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
RGTU Omega Ratio Rank: 27
RGTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
RGTU Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSEX vs. RGTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF (CSEX) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSEX	RGTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.09	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.58	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.17	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.21	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.27	—

Drawdowns

CSEX vs. RGTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSEX drawdown since its inception was -56.45%, smaller than the maximum RGTU drawdown of -96.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSEX and RGTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSEX	RGTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.45%	-96.96%	+40.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-96.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.08%	-95.06%	+50.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.45%	-63.73%	+35.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	73.57%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CSEX	RGTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	64.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	141.95%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	156.56%	219.15%	-62.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	156.56%	219.15%	-62.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	156.56%	219.15%	-62.59%

CSEX vs. RGTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CSEX and RGTU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

CSEX vs. RGTU - Dividend Comparison

CSEX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.70%.

Position	TTM	2025
CSEX Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	46.70%	20.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSEX and RGTU in my portfolio?

CSEX and RGTU have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CSEX or RGTU?

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSEX or RGTU?

CSEX and RGTU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSEX or RGTU?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 46.70%, compared with 0.00% for CSEX.