PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSEX vs. NEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSEX vs. NEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF (CSEX) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSEX achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly higher than NEMG's -26.85% return.


CSEX

1D
6.05%
1M
-10.41%
YTD
7.63%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NEMG

1D
-8.05%
1M
-26.46%
YTD
-26.85%
6M
-34.01%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSEX vs. NEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CSEX
Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF
7.63%-16.41%
NEMG
Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF
-26.85%22.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CSEX and NEMG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSEX vs. NEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF (CSEX) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CSEX vs. NEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSEX vs. NEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSEX drawdown since its inception was -56.45%, roughly equal to the maximum NEMG drawdown of -57.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSEX and NEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSEXNEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.45%

-57.56%

+1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.08%

-57.19%

+13.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.45%

-23.44%

-5.01%

Volatility

CSEX vs. NEMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSEXNEMGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

156.56%

102.85%

+53.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

156.56%

102.85%

+53.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

156.56%

102.85%

+53.71%

CSEX vs. NEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSEX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NEMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSEX vs. NEMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSEX nor NEMG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CSEX and NEMG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CSEX.

CSEX and NEMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CSEX and 0.75% for NEMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSEX and NEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer