CSEX vs. INTW
CSEX (Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSEX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.
Performance
CSEX vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSEX achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 741.14% return.
CSEX
- 1D
- 6.05%
- 1M
- -10.41%
- YTD
- 7.63%
- 6M
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 11.01%
- YTD
- 741.14%
- 6M
- 775.21%
- 1Y
- 1,708.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSEX vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSEX Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF | 7.63% | -19.20% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 741.14% | -9.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSEX and INTW is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSEX vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
CSEX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INTW
CSEX vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF (CSEX) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSEX | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.63 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 35.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 79.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSEX vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSEX drawdown since its inception was -56.45%, smaller than the maximum INTW drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSEX and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSEX | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.45% | -60.58% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.08% | -13.43% | -30.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.45% | -29.61% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.72% | — |
Volatility
CSEX vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSEX | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 55.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 119.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 156.56% | 150.16% | +6.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 156.56% | 148.67% | +7.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 156.56% | 148.67% | +7.89% |
CSEX vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSEX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSEX vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSEX nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSEX and INTW have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSEX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSEX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
CSEX and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CSEX and 1.50% for INTW.
Find the right allocation for CSEX and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer