CSEX vs. FUTG
CSEX (Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF) and FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSEX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FUTG.
Performance
CSEX vs. FUTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSEX achieves a 79.70% return, which is significantly higher than FUTG's -75.53% return.
CSEX
- 1D
- -6.65%
- 1M
- 12.86%
- YTD
- 79.70%
- 6M
- 57.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUTG
- 1D
- -11.10%
- 1M
- -70.24%
- YTD
- -75.53%
- 6M
- -77.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSEX vs. FUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSEX Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF | 79.70% | -7.02% |
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | -75.53% | -19.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSEX and FUTG is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSEX vs. FUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF (CSEX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSEX | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | -0.66 | +1.68 |
Drawdowns
CSEX vs. FUTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSEX drawdown since its inception was -56.45%, smaller than the maximum FUTG drawdown of -86.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSEX and FUTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSEX | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.45% | -86.19% | +29.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.65% | -84.29% | +77.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.55% | -40.35% | +12.80% |
Volatility
CSEX vs. FUTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSEX | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 154.86% | 136.01% | +18.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 154.86% | 136.01% | +18.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 154.86% | 136.01% | +18.85% |
CSEX vs. FUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSEX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSEX vs. FUTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSEX nor FUTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSEX and FUTG have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CSEX.
CSEX and FUTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CSEX and 0.75% for FUTG.
Find the right allocation for CSEX and FUTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer