CSEIX vs. TRLGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CSEIX (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc.) and TRLGX (T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - CSEIX is a REIT fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while TRLGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, CSEIX returned 7.00%/yr vs 18.48%/yr for TRLGX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSEIX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TRLGX.

Performance

CSEIX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. (CSEIX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSEIX achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than TRLGX's -0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, CSEIX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 7.00%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.48% annualized return.

CSEIX

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -0.55%
• YTD: 13.06%
• 6M: 13.77%
• 1Y: 11.65%
• 3Y*: 12.10%
• 5Y*: 3.82%
• 10Y*: 7.00%

TRLGX

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: -2.62%
• YTD: -0.26%
• 6M: -1.17%
• 1Y: 14.05%
• 3Y*: 22.59%
• 5Y*: 10.25%
• 10Y*: 18.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSEIX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CSEIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc.	13.06%	4.01%	6.50%	12.81%	-26.47%	41.29%	-1.99%	31.50%	-4.52%	7.79%
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund	-0.26%	17.51%	37.57%	46.22%	-35.26%	23.24%	39.57%	28.51%	4.35%	37.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CSEIX and TRLGX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2001	0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between CSEIX and TRLGX has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CSEIX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSEIX

CSEIX Risk / Return Rank: 17
CSEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
CSEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CSEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
CSEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CSEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

TRLGX

TRLGX Risk / Return Rank: 11
TRLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
TRLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
TRLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
TRLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
TRLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSEIX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. (CSEIX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSEIX	TRLGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	0.92	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	1.34	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.17	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	0.83	+0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.91	2.57	+2.34

CSEIX vs. TRLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSEIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the TRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSEIX and TRLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CSEIX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSEIX drawdown since its inception was -72.58%, which is greater than TRLGX's maximum drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSEIX and TRLGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSEIX	TRLGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.58%	-55.56%	-17.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.92%	-18.18%	+10.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.31%	-21.17%	+3.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.25%	-40.44%	+7.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.75%	-40.44%	-2.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-5.97%	+4.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.71%	-8.67%	-2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.69%	5.85%	-3.16%

Volatility

CSEIX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. (CSEIX) is 5.14%, while T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that CSEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSEIX	TRLGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.14%	6.43%	-1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.65%	13.44%	-2.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.89%	16.52%	-2.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.90%	22.48%	-3.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.98%	21.83%	-0.85%

CSEIX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSEIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSEIX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison

CSEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than TRLGX's 13.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSEIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc.	3.38%	3.75%	2.72%	2.89%	7.91%	4.37%	5.48%	7.83%	3.51%	2.39%	5.87%	23.00%
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund	13.73%	13.69%	9.80%	2.04%	3.88%	2.56%	0.42%	4.09%	7.93%	9.27%	1.64%	4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSEIX and TRLGX in my portfolio?

CSEIX and TRLGX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSEIX or TRLGX?

TRLGX has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to CSEIX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSEIX dropped -72.58% vs TRLGX's -55.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.