CSEIX vs. ICF
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. (CSEIX) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF).
CSEIX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 2, 1997. ICF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2001.
Performance
CSEIX vs. ICF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSEIX vs. ICF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSEIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. | 1.43% | 4.01% | 6.50% | 12.81% | -26.47% | 41.29% | -1.99% | 31.50% | -4.52% | 7.79% |
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 4.03% | 1.85% | 5.30% | 10.36% | -26.12% | 44.17% | -5.43% | 25.48% | -2.55% | 4.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSEIX achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than ICF's 4.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CSEIX has outperformed ICF with an annualized return of 6.04%, while ICF has yielded a comparatively lower 4.70% annualized return.
CSEIX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -7.27%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- -0.16%
- 1Y
- 2.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.33%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- 6.04%
ICF
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- YTD
- 4.03%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSEIX vs. ICF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSEIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than ICF's 0.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSEIX vs. ICF — Risk / Return Rank
CSEIX
ICF
CSEIX vs. ICF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. (CSEIX) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSEIX | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.18 | 0.21 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.35 | 0.39 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 0.38 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.93 | 1.37 | -0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSEIX | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | 0.21 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.19 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.23 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.30 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSEIX and ICF is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSEIX vs. ICF - Dividend Comparison
CSEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than ICF's 2.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSEIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. | 3.08% | 3.75% | 2.72% | 2.89% | 7.91% | 4.37% | 5.48% | 7.83% | 3.51% | 2.39% | 5.87% | 23.00% |
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.67% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.21% | 3.30% |
Drawdowns
CSEIX vs. ICF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSEIX drawdown since its inception was -72.58%, smaller than the maximum ICF drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSEIX and ICF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSEIX | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.58% | -76.74% | +4.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -11.77% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.25% | -34.74% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.75% | -40.22% | -2.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -9.04% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.79% | -14.26% | +3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 3.24% | -0.23% |
Volatility
CSEIX vs. ICF - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. (CSEIX) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) have volatilities of 4.34% and 4.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSEIX | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 4.43% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.50% | 9.64% | -0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.96% | 16.33% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 18.91% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 20.59% | +0.33% |