PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSEIX vs. AIGYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSEIX vs. AIGYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. (CSEIX) and abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund (AIGYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSEIX achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly lower than AIGYX's 21.63% return. Over the past 10 years, CSEIX has underperformed AIGYX with an annualized return of 6.41%, while AIGYX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.86% annualized return.


CSEIX

1D
-1.17%
1M
1.76%
6M
14.99%
YTD
16.85%
1Y
18.01%
3Y*
10.70%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
6.41%
ALL TIME*
8.91%

AIGYX

1D
-1.03%
1M
1.72%
6M
18.09%
YTD
21.63%
1Y
28.30%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
7.86%
ALL TIME*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CSEIX vs. AIGYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSEIX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc.
16.85%4.01%6.50%12.81%-26.47%41.29%-1.99%31.50%-4.52%7.79%
AIGYX
abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund
21.63%4.20%9.61%13.34%-24.99%62.09%-6.59%27.80%-7.59%8.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CSEIX and AIGYX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999

0.97

The correlation between CSEIX and AIGYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSEIX vs. AIGYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSEIX
CSEIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CSEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CSEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

AIGYX
AIGYX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AIGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSEIX vs. AIGYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. (CSEIX) and abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund (AIGYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSEIXAIGYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.33

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

3.39

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.29

11.96

-4.67

CSEIX vs. AIGYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the AIGYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSEIX and AIGYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSEIX vs. AIGYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSEIX drawdown since its inception was -72.58%, smaller than the maximum AIGYX drawdown of -79.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSEIX and AIGYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSEIXAIGYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.58%

-79.94%

+7.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.92%

-7.71%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.31%

-18.26%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.25%

-31.20%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.75%

-43.10%

+0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-2.89%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.68%

-12.35%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

2.19%

+0.21%

Volatility

CSEIX vs. AIGYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. (CSEIX) is 4.24%, while abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund (AIGYX) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that CSEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIGYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSEIXAIGYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

4.80%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.15%

11.23%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.11%

13.89%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.94%

20.77%

-1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.99%

22.00%

-1.01%

CSEIX vs. AIGYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSEIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AIGYX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSEIX vs. AIGYX - Dividend Comparison

CSEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than AIGYX's 6.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIGYX
abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund
6.59%8.43%12.69%4.01%8.97%27.57%16.28%18.30%49.34%5.85%5.48%4.69%
CSEIX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc.
3.16%3.75%2.72%2.89%7.91%4.37%5.48%7.83%3.51%2.39%5.87%23.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, CSEIX and AIGYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AIGYX has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to CSEIX (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSEIX dropped -72.58% vs AIGYX's -79.94%.

AIGYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSEIX and AIGYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer