CSDIX vs. HLRRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund CLASS I (CSDIX) and LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX).
CSDIX is an actively managed fund by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Jul 15, 1998. HLRRX is managed by REMSGroup. It was launched on Dec 16, 2002.
Performance
CSDIX vs. HLRRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSDIX vs. HLRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSDIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund CLASS I | 1.50% | 4.32% | 6.73% | 13.18% | -26.33% | 41.70% | -1.74% | 31.84% | -4.25% | 8.09% |
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund | 3.75% | -9.13% | 9.45% | 10.50% | -21.40% | 40.50% | -3.78% | 31.75% | -13.63% | -1.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSDIX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than HLRRX's 3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CSDIX has outperformed HLRRX with an annualized return of 6.33%, while HLRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.00% annualized return.
CSDIX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 2.37%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- 6.33%
HLRRX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- -1.29%
- 3Y*
- 4.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.12%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSDIX vs. HLRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSDIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than HLRRX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSDIX vs. HLRRX — Risk / Return Rank
CSDIX
HLRRX
CSDIX vs. HLRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund CLASS I (CSDIX) and LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSDIX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.19 | -0.06 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.37 | 0.02 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.00 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | -0.13 | +0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.03 | -0.34 | +1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSDIX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | -0.06 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.12 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.19 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.32 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSDIX and HLRRX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSDIX vs. HLRRX - Dividend Comparison
CSDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than HLRRX's 7.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSDIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund CLASS I | 3.03% | 3.72% | 2.78% | 2.93% | 7.67% | 4.30% | 5.39% | 7.62% | 3.60% | 2.52% | 5.84% | 19.24% |
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund | 7.74% | 9.39% | 4.93% | 5.50% | 13.71% | 17.02% | 9.10% | 2.44% | 2.68% | 17.61% | 15.94% | 10.13% |
Drawdowns
CSDIX vs. HLRRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSDIX drawdown since its inception was -72.37%, which is greater than HLRRX's maximum drawdown of -62.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSDIX and HLRRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSDIX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.37% | -62.78% | -9.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -11.74% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.09% | -28.99% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.68% | -48.13% | +5.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.65% | -12.54% | +4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.00% | -8.52% | -2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 4.33% | -1.35% |
Volatility
CSDIX vs. HLRRX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund CLASS I (CSDIX) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) at 3.62%. This indicates that CSDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSDIX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 3.62% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.50% | 8.74% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.99% | 15.53% | +0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 17.55% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 20.80% | +0.04% |