PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSCS vs. NVDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSCS vs. NVDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares (CSCS) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSCS achieves a -42.32% return, which is significantly lower than NVDU's 19.93% return.


CSCS

1D
1.10%
1M
-28.69%
YTD
-42.32%
6M
-41.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDU

1D
-7.30%
1M
14.13%
YTD
19.93%
6M
27.09%
1Y
84.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSCS vs. NVDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CSCS
Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares
-42.32%-11.22%
NVDU
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF
19.93%30.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CSCS and NVDU is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

-0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSCS vs. NVDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSCS

NVDU
NVDU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NVDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDU Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSCS vs. NVDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares (CSCS) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CSCS vs. NVDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSCSNVDUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.67

1.14

-2.81

Drawdowns

CSCS vs. NVDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSCS drawdown since its inception was -50.80%, smaller than the maximum NVDU drawdown of -67.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCS and NVDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSCSNVDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.80%

-67.27%

+16.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.26%

-18.32%

-31.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.70%

-18.84%

+5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.47%

Volatility

CSCS vs. NVDU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSCSNVDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.62%

68.02%

-37.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.62%

91.06%

-60.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.62%

91.06%

-60.44%

CSCS vs. NVDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSCS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDU's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSCS vs. NVDU - Dividend Comparison

CSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than NVDU's 4.83% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CSCS
Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares
4.02%1.72%0.00%0.00%
NVDU
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF
4.83%5.68%16.85%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSCS and NVDU have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSCS is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSCS is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for NVDU.

NVDU has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 4.02% for CSCS.

CSCS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while NVDU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for CSCS and 1.04% for NVDU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSCS and NVDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer