PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSCO vs. MA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CSCO vs. MA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSCO achieves a 59.62% return, which is significantly higher than MA's -13.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSCO having a 18.93% annualized return and MA not far behind at 18.35%.


CSCO

1D
-6.43%
1M
32.74%
YTD
59.62%
6M
57.69%
1Y
92.57%
3Y*
38.44%
5Y*
21.02%
10Y*
18.93%

MA

1D
1.93%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
-13.70%
6M
-9.69%
1Y
-15.62%
3Y*
9.57%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
18.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSCO vs. MA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
59.62%33.47%21.00%9.30%-22.46%45.76%-3.49%13.81%16.57%31.27%
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
-13.70%9.04%24.17%23.40%-2.66%1.16%20.19%59.16%25.31%47.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CSCO and MA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2006

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between CSCO and MA has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSCO:

$484.98B

MA:

$438.53B

EPS

CSCO:

$3.00

MA:

$17.28

PE Ratio

CSCO:

40.58

MA:

28.43

PEG Ratio

CSCO:

34.05

MA:

1.66

PS Ratio

CSCO:

7.99

MA:

13.04

PB Ratio

CSCO:

9.93

MA:

65.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSCO:

$60.75B

MA:

$33.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSCO:

$39.08B

MA:

$26.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

CSCO:

$13.98B

MA:

$21.23B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSCO vs. MA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSCO
CSCO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CSCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSCO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CSCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

MA
MA Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MA Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MA Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSCO vs. MA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSCOMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

0.89

+0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.86

-0.75

+7.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.16

-1.54

+20.70

CSCO vs. MA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSCO Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the MA Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSCO and MA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSCOMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

-0.71

+3.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.28

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.68

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.83

-0.23

Drawdowns

CSCO vs. MA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSCO drawdown since its inception was -89.26%, which is greater than MA's maximum drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCO and MA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSCOMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.26%

-62.67%

-26.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

-20.91%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.16%

-20.91%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.68%

-28.25%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.95%

-41.00%

-0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.43%

-17.64%

+11.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-9.82%

-30.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.85%

10.19%

-5.34%

Volatility

CSCO vs. MA - Volatility Comparison

Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) has a higher volatility of 16.94% compared to Mastercard Incorporated (MA) at 6.54%. This indicates that CSCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSCOMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.94%

6.54%

+10.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.88%

17.46%

+9.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.71%

22.23%

+8.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.80%

23.98%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.85%

26.92%

-1.07%

Dividends

CSCO vs. MA - Dividend Comparison

CSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than MA's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.36%2.12%2.69%3.07%3.17%2.32%3.20%2.88%2.95%2.95%3.28%3.02%
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
0.66%0.53%0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%

Financials

CSCO vs. MA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cisco Systems, Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B20222023202420252026
15.84B
8.40B
(CSCO) Total Revenue
(MA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CSCO vs. MA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cisco Systems, Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
63.6%
58.4%
Portfolio components
CSCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.08B and revenue of 15.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.6%.

MA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a gross profit of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

CSCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.0%.

MA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported an operating income of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.4%.

CSCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 3.37B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in a net margin of 21.3%.

MA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a net income of 3.88B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 46.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSCO and MA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSCO has higher volatility (16.94%) compared to MA (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSCO dropped -89.26% vs MA's -62.67%.

CSCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSCO and MA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer