PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSCO vs. FTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CSCO vs. FTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSCO achieves a 52.77% return, which is significantly lower than FTI's 61.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CSCO has outperformed FTI with an annualized return of 17.69%, while FTI has yielded a comparatively lower 15.63% annualized return.


CSCO

1D
2.14%
1M
-0.50%
6M
49.46%
YTD
52.77%
1Y
73.90%
3Y*
33.59%
5Y*
19.23%
10Y*
17.69%
ALL TIME*
23.57%

FTI

1D
3.98%
1M
10.06%
6M
28.80%
YTD
61.05%
1Y
97.83%
3Y*
59.85%
5Y*
58.89%
10Y*
15.63%
ALL TIME*
12.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.18B$2.38B$2.92B
$254.67M$262.31M$331.74M

CSCO vs. FTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
52.77%33.47%21.00%9.30%-22.46%45.76%-3.49%13.81%16.57%31.27%
FTI
TechnipFMC plc
61.05%54.90%44.78%66.07%105.91%-15.36%-55.23%12.09%-36.32%-11.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CSCO and FTI is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2001

0.30

The correlation between CSCO and FTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSCO:

$457.17B

FTI:

$28.57B

EPS

CSCO:

$3.00

FTI:

$2.86

PE Ratio

CSCO:

38.69

FTI:

25.03

PEG Ratio

CSCO:

32.46

FTI:

0.03

PS Ratio

CSCO:

7.62

FTI:

2.83

PB Ratio

CSCO:

9.46

FTI:

8.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSCO:

$60.75B

FTI:

$10.40B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSCO:

$39.08B

FTI:

$3.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

CSCO:

$13.98B

FTI:

$1.86B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSCO vs. FTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSCO
CSCO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CSCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSCO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CSCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FTI
FTI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTI Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSCO vs. FTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSCOFTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.48

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

5.98

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.72

17.23

-5.51

CSCO vs. FTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSCO Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the FTI Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSCO and FTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSCO vs. FTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSCO drawdown since its inception was -89.26%, roughly equal to the maximum FTI drawdown of -91.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCO and FTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSCOFTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.26%

-91.74%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.33%

-16.44%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.16%

-28.94%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.68%

-36.71%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.95%

-85.71%

+43.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.44%

-6.86%

-3.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.01%

-33.78%

-6.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.33%

5.74%

+0.59%

Volatility

CSCO vs. FTI - Volatility Comparison

Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI) have volatilities of 10.19% and 10.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSCOFTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.19%

10.26%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.00%

23.71%

+5.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.79%

31.03%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.35%

41.90%

-16.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.07%

47.67%

-21.60%

Dividends

CSCO vs. FTI - Dividend Comparison

CSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than FTI's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.43%2.12%2.69%3.07%3.17%2.32%3.20%2.88%2.95%2.95%3.28%3.02%
FTI
TechnipFMC plc
0.28%0.45%0.69%0.50%0.00%0.00%1.38%2.43%2.66%0.42%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CSCO vs. FTI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cisco Systems, Inc. and TechnipFMC plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CSCO vs. FTI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cisco Systems, Inc. and TechnipFMC plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CSCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.08B and revenue of 15.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.6%.

FTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a gross profit of 1.40B and revenue of 2.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.

CSCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.0%.

FTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported an operating income of 484.70M and revenue of 2.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.5%.

CSCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 3.37B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in a net margin of 21.3%.

FTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a net income of 362.70M and revenue of 2.76B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSCO and FTI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTI has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to CSCO (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSCO dropped -89.26% vs FTI's -91.74%.

FTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSCO and FTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer