CSCO vs. BIL
CSCO (Cisco Systems, Inc.) is a stock, while BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Over the past 10 years, CSCO returned 19.37%/yr vs 2.18%/yr for BIL. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CSCO vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSCO achieves a 66.00% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, CSCO has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 19.37%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.18% annualized return.
CSCO
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 36.56%
- YTD
- 66.00%
- 6M
- 64.46%
- 1Y
- 101.07%
- 3Y*
- 40.06%
- 5Y*
- 21.97%
- 10Y*
- 19.37%
BIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.18%
CSCO vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 66.00% | 33.47% | 21.00% | 9.30% | -22.46% | 45.76% | -3.49% | 13.81% | 16.57% | 31.27% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.49% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.10% | 0.40% | 2.03% | 1.74% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSCO and BIL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007 | -0.01 |
The correlation between CSCO and BIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.01 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSCO vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
CSCO
BIL
CSCO vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSCO | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -16.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -170.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 87.91 | -86.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.49 | 355.35 | -347.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.00 | 2,817.77 | -2,796.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSCO | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.40 | 19.71 | -16.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 13.16 | -12.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 8.52 | -7.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 2.78 | -2.16 |
Drawdowns
CSCO vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSCO drawdown since its inception was -89.26%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCO and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSCO | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.26% | -0.78% | -88.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -0.01% | -13.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.16% | -0.01% | -20.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.68% | -0.10% | -36.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.95% | -0.21% | -41.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | 0.00% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.14% | -0.26% | -39.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.83% | 0.00% | +4.83% |
Volatility
CSCO vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) has a higher volatility of 15.37% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that CSCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSCO | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.37% | 0.05% | +15.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.85% | 0.13% | +25.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.87% | 0.20% | +29.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.62% | 0.26% | +24.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.76% | 0.26% | +25.50% |
Dividends
CSCO vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
CSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.86% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% | 0.00% |
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 1.30% | 2.12% | 2.69% | 3.07% | 3.17% | 2.32% | 3.20% | 2.88% | 2.95% | 2.95% | 3.28% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSCO and BIL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSCO has higher volatility (15.37%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSCO dropped -89.26% vs BIL's -0.78%.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 3.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSCO and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer