PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSCO vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSCO vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSCO achieves a 66.00% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, CSCO has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 19.37%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.18% annualized return.


CSCO

1D
-1.17%
1M
36.56%
YTD
66.00%
6M
64.46%
1Y
101.07%
3Y*
40.06%
5Y*
21.97%
10Y*
19.37%

BIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSCO vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
66.00%33.47%21.00%9.30%-22.46%45.76%-3.49%13.81%16.57%31.27%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.49%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CSCO and BIL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

-0.01

The correlation between CSCO and BIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.01 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSCO vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSCO
CSCO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CSCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSCO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CSCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSCO vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSCOBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-170.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

87.91

-86.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.49

355.35

-347.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.00

2,817.77

-2,796.77

CSCO vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSCO Sharpe Ratio is 3.40, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSCO and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSCOBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40

19.71

-16.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

13.16

-12.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

8.52

-7.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

2.78

-2.16

Drawdowns

CSCO vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSCO drawdown since its inception was -89.26%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCO and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSCOBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.26%

-0.78%

-88.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

-0.01%

-13.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.16%

-0.01%

-20.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.68%

-0.10%

-36.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.95%

-0.21%

-41.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

0.00%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-0.26%

-39.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

0.00%

+4.83%

Volatility

CSCO vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) has a higher volatility of 15.37% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that CSCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSCOBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.37%

0.05%

+15.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.85%

0.13%

+25.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.87%

0.20%

+29.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.62%

0.26%

+24.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.76%

0.26%

+25.50%

Dividends

CSCO vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

CSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.30%2.12%2.69%3.07%3.17%2.32%3.20%2.88%2.95%2.95%3.28%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSCO and BIL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSCO has higher volatility (15.37%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSCO dropped -89.26% vs BIL's -0.78%.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 3.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSCO and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer