PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSCL vs. XDSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSCL vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares (CSCL) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSCL achieves a 160.53% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's 2.84% return.


CSCL

1D
5.31%
1M
84.09%
YTD
160.53%
6M
153.22%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDSQ

1D
0.04%
1M
1.36%
YTD
2.84%
6M
3.73%
1Y
16.08%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSCL vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CSCL
Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares
160.53%20.48%
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
2.84%11.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CSCL and XDSQ is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.38

CSCL vs. XDSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSCL
XDSQ

Technology

100.0%
35.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Technology

CSCL
100.0%
XDSQ
35.7%

Basic Materials

CSCL

-

XDSQ
1.8%

Communication Services

CSCL

-

XDSQ
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CSCL

-

XDSQ
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

CSCL

-

XDSQ
4.9%

Energy

CSCL

-

XDSQ
3.5%

Financial Services

CSCL

-

XDSQ
11.6%

Healthcare

CSCL

-

XDSQ
8.5%

Industrials

CSCL

-

XDSQ
8.3%

Real Estate

CSCL

-

XDSQ
1.9%

Utilities

CSCL

-

XDSQ
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSCL vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSCL

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSCL vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares (CSCL) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CSCL vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSCLXDSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.89

0.69

+3.20

Drawdowns

CSCL vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSCL drawdown since its inception was -27.15%, roughly equal to the maximum XDSQ drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCL and XDSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSCLXDSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.15%

-26.06%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.49%

-4.96%

-3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

Volatility

CSCL vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSCLXDSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.12%

10.54%

+50.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.12%

15.27%

+45.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.12%

15.09%

+46.03%

CSCL vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSCL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSCL vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

CSCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSCL and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for CSCL.

CSCL has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for CSCL and 0.79% for XDSQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSCL and XDSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer