CSB vs. HSMV
CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) and HSMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. CSB is passively managed, while HSMV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSB returned 3.65%/yr vs 3.69%/yr for HSMV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for HSMV.
Performance
CSB vs. HSMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSB achieves a 8.30% return, which is significantly higher than HSMV's 3.11% return.
CSB
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 8.30%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 17.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
HSMV
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- —
CSB vs. HSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 8.30% | 2.26% | 9.64% | 12.60% | -13.11% | 27.04% | 67.57% |
HSMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF | 3.11% | 1.57% | 13.17% | 5.01% | -9.44% | 23.72% | 34.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSB and HSMV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between CSB and HSMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
CSB vs. HSMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSB
HSMV
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Technology
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
CSB
HSMV
Utilities
CSB
HSMV
Consumer Cyclical
CSB
HSMV
Energy
CSB
HSMV
Industrials
CSB
HSMV
Consumer Defensive
CSB
HSMV
Communication Services
CSB
HSMV
Basic Materials
CSB
HSMV
Technology
CSB
HSMV
Healthcare
CSB
HSMV
Real Estate
CSB
-
HSMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSB vs. HSMV — Risk / Return Rank
CSB
HSMV
CSB vs. HSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSB | HSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 0.41 | +0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.92 | 0.68 | +1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.07 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 0.54 | +1.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.26 | 1.62 | +5.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSB | HSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 0.41 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.25 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.67 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
CSB vs. HSMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSB drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, which is greater than HSMV's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSB and HSMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSB | HSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.07% | -19.16% | -22.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.18% | -7.83% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.82% | -15.45% | -6.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.49% | -19.16% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.12% | -4.36% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -5.62% | -1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 2.59% | -0.11% |
Volatility
CSB vs. HSMV - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) at 2.85%. This indicates that CSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSB | HSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 2.85% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.19% | 7.28% | +1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.54% | 10.37% | +4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 15.00% | +3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.31% | 16.06% | +5.25% |
CSB vs. HSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HSMV's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSB vs. HSMV - Dividend Comparison
CSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than HSMV's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.26% | 3.54% | 3.12% | 3.45% | 3.60% | 3.11% | 3.70% | 3.19% | 3.45% | 3.19% | 2.85% | 1.57% |
HSMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.43% | 1.43% | 1.26% | 0.76% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSB and HSMV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSB has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to HSMV (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSB dropped -42.07% vs HSMV's -19.16%.
On 5-year performance, HSMV leads with 3.69% vs 3.65% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HSMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HSMV has performed better with a 3.69% return vs 3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HSMV.
CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.00% for HSMV.
They also come from different issuers: Crestview and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CSB and 0.80% for HSMV.
CSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSB and HSMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer