CSAAX vs. RWSIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CSAAX (Manteio Managed Futures Fund A) and RWSIX (Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund) are both Systematic Trend funds. Over the past 5 years, CSAAX returned 0.13%/yr vs 2.42%/yr for RWSIX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSAAX charges 1.58%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for RWSIX.

Performance

CSAAX vs. RWSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manteio Managed Futures Fund A (CSAAX) and Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSAAX achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly lower than RWSIX's 9.73% return.

CSAAX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 6.11%
• 6M: 8.59%
• 1Y: 13.10%
• 3Y*: -3.55%
• 5Y*: 0.13%
• 10Y*: 0.36%

RWSIX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: 9.73%
• 6M: 10.72%
• 1Y: 17.30%
• 3Y*: 3.69%
• 5Y*: 2.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSAAX vs. RWSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CSAAX Manteio Managed Futures Fund A	6.11%	-6.15%	-5.81%	-6.29%	20.93%	7.18%	1.57%	-4.58%	-4.32%	2.80%
RWSIX Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund	9.73%	-2.43%	-0.64%	8.92%	-6.10%	18.37%	22.40%	11.18%	-3.55%	-6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CSAAX and RWSIX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017	0.08

The correlation between CSAAX and RWSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (5 years) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CSAAX vs. RWSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSAAX

CSAAX Risk / Return Rank: 17
CSAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
CSAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CSAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
CSAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
CSAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

RWSIX

RWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 32
RWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
RWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
RWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
RWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
RWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSAAX vs. RWSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manteio Managed Futures Fund A (CSAAX) and Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSAAX	RWSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	1.63	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	2.33	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.29	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	2.08	-0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.56	7.63	-3.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSAAX vs. RWSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the RWSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSAAX and RWSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSAAX	RWSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	1.63	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	0.20	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.45	-0.22

Drawdowns

CSAAX vs. RWSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSAAX drawdown since its inception was -29.18%, which is greater than RWSIX's maximum drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSAAX and RWSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSAAX	RWSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.18%	-24.90%	-4.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.71%	-8.37%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.80%	-24.90%	+2.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.18%	-24.90%	-4.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.37%	-8.67%	-9.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.66%	-6.81%	-3.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	2.28%	+0.53%

Volatility

CSAAX vs. RWSIX - Volatility Comparison

Manteio Managed Futures Fund A (CSAAX) and Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX) have volatilities of 3.45% and 3.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSAAX	RWSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.45%	3.29%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.54%	8.36%	+2.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.38%	10.69%	+0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.43%	12.19%	-1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.08%	12.29%	-2.21%

CSAAX vs. RWSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSAAX has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than RWSIX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSAAX vs. RWSIX - Dividend Comparison

CSAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than RWSIX's 4.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSAAX Manteio Managed Futures Fund A	2.65%	2.13%	1.76%	0.27%	18.83%	8.69%	0.00%	1.51%	0.00%	0.00%	2.66%	8.46%
RWSIX Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund	4.11%	4.51%	0.00%	10.35%	3.41%	7.81%	7.78%	3.05%	2.51%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSAAX and RWSIX in my portfolio?

CSAAX and RWSIX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSAAX or RWSIX?

CSAAX has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to RWSIX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSAAX dropped -29.18% vs RWSIX's -24.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.