PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSAAX vs. QNZNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CSAAX vs. QNZNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manteio Managed Futures Fund A (CSAAX) and AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CSAAX vs. QNZNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CSAAX
Manteio Managed Futures Fund A
2.61%-6.15%-5.81%-6.29%6.90%
QNZNX
AQR Trend Total Return Fund
5.99%22.88%34.96%22.73%1.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSAAX achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly lower than QNZNX's 5.99% return.


CSAAX

1D
-0.63%
1M
-3.25%
YTD
2.61%
6M
6.53%
1Y
-4.27%
3Y*
-3.91%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*
-0.09%

QNZNX

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
5.99%
6M
10.93%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
27.66%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CSAAX vs. QNZNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSAAX has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than QNZNX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CSAAX vs. QNZNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSAAX
CSAAX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CSAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CSAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

QNZNX
QNZNX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QNZNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNZNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNZNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QNZNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNZNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSAAX vs. QNZNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manteio Managed Futures Fund A (CSAAX) and AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSAAXQNZNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.40

2.01

-2.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.43

2.53

-2.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.39

-0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

2.56

-2.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.48

12.74

-13.22

CSAAX vs. QNZNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSAAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the QNZNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSAAX and QNZNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSAAXQNZNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

2.01

-2.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

1.77

-1.55

Correlation

The correlation between CSAAX and QNZNX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CSAAX vs. QNZNX - Dividend Comparison

CSAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than QNZNX's 0.81% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSAAX
Manteio Managed Futures Fund A
2.74%2.13%1.76%0.27%18.83%8.69%0.00%1.51%0.00%0.00%2.66%8.46%
QNZNX
AQR Trend Total Return Fund
0.81%0.86%16.46%23.14%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CSAAX vs. QNZNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSAAX drawdown since its inception was -29.18%, which is greater than QNZNX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSAAX and QNZNX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CSAAXQNZNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.18%

-18.38%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.92%

-10.29%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.06%

-3.03%

-18.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.55%

-2.88%

-7.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.55%

2.06%

+8.49%

Volatility

CSAAX vs. QNZNX - Volatility Comparison

Manteio Managed Futures Fund A (CSAAX) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX) at 2.52%. This indicates that CSAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QNZNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CSAAXQNZNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

2.52%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

8.87%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

13.68%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.39%

12.20%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.02%

12.20%

-2.18%